IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Call for Adoption - draft-fanf-dane-mua-00

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 08 January 2013 02:00 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C8421F8645 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:00:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CQ886ZzDOA6F for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD4021F8628 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:00:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.176] (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0330F4005D; Mon, 7 Jan 2013 19:05:24 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <50EB65D5.2000204@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:18:29 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <A0453496-AFC1-41AF-8137-F46EDB9AC4B3@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <A0453496-AFC1-41AF-8137-F46EDB9AC4B3@kumari.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF DANE WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] Call for Adoption - draft-fanf-dane-mua-00
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 02:00:21 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/20/12 10:17 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> Dear DANE Working Group,
> 
> This  starts a 4-week (because of time of year) consensus call on 
> adopting  draft-fanf-dane-mua-00 as a DANE WG document.

I have no objections to adopting this work in the DANE WG, but given
how similar this spec is in concept to
draft-miller-xmpp-dnssec-prooftype (indeed, Matt Miller and I had
talked with Tony about the possibility of merging our efforts), I am
wondering what is the best way to ensure harmony between the MUA
recommendations and the XMPP recommendations.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlDrZdUACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzi9QCgsyCzFdw03IQYMX1PnZ4C3NSQ
c7kAoOd4k6NZ+6EFS4BFa5T5ahuv3Vdk
=IOPH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email