Re: [dane] DANE-SRV, SNI functional equivalent and XMPP

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Thu, 21 May 2015 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C351AD26E for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2015 05:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M5P7Jnjx98Vj for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2015 05:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [38.117.134.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C87F91AD248 for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2015 05:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1034) id 87165283015; Thu, 21 May 2015 12:26:52 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:26:52 +0000
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: dane@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150521122652.GK17272@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <5558C801.7030304@zash.se> <555A61CA.2020108@andyet.net> <555B224D.20709@zash.se> <555B4CB3.3020203@andyet.net> <555B51AB.9070303@andyet.net> <20150519232414.GQ17272@mournblade.imrryr.org> <555BF56F.8020103@andyet.net> <20150520080404.GU17272@mournblade.imrryr.org> <555C9704.7020000@andyet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <555C9704.7020000@andyet.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/ZAYxNbIAXBR7zNh4_WGgEpl9j9A>
Subject: Re: [dane] DANE-SRV, SNI functional equivalent and XMPP
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dane@ietf.org
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 12:26:56 -0000

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:15:32AM -0700, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:

> >I did not get a chance to read the text in context.  Adding the target name
> >as a secondary indentifier is fine, but indeed the SNI name should not
> >change absent signalling via TLSA RRs.
> 
> OK, great, then I think we're in agreement.

Yes, we are.

-- 
	Viktor.