[dane] draft-fanf-dane-mua-00
Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 27 June 2012 19:09 UTC
Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66A721F866B for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.478, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AD4-yjHm0Ogn for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.150]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2996421F8665 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:37164) by ppsw-50.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1Sjxci-00050s-sS (Exim 4.72) for dane@ietf.org (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:09:56 +0100
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1Sjxci-0003WK-Qu (Exim 4.67) for dane@ietf.org (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:09:56 +0100
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:09:56 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: dane@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1206271959200.23668@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: [dane] draft-fanf-dane-mua-00
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 19:10:00 -0000
At long last, I have got what I hope is a plausible spec for using DANE with IMAP, POP3, and message submission. I think my main struggle was working out what I did not need to put in the document. The compatibility bits are particularly tricky. The structure owes a fair amount to Matt Miller and PSA's XMPP draft, and to RFC 6186. I have also made a minor revision to my other draft which is now draft-fanf-dane-smt-04. This is mainly to flag up points for discussion in Vancouver. All questions / comments / suggestions welcome! Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Trafalgar: Variable mainly northwesterly 3 or 4, but easterly 5 to 7 at first in far southeast. Rough at first in far southeast, otherwise slight or moderate. Showers, fog patches. Moderate or good, occasionally very poor. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:58:10 -0700 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: dot@dotat.at Subject: New Version Notification for draft-fanf-dane-mua-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-fanf-dane-mua-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Tony Finch and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-fanf-dane-mua Revision: 00 Title: DNSSEC and TLSA records for IMAP, POP3, and message submission Creation date: 2012-06-27 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 8 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fanf-dane-mua-00.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fanf-dane-mua Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fanf-dane-mua-00 Abstract: This specification describes the effect that DNSSEC has on SRV-based autoconfiguration and TLS certificate verification in the mail user agent protocols IMAP, POP3, and message submission. It also describes how to use TLSA DNS records to provide stronger authentication of server TLS certificates. The IETF Secretariat
- [dane] draft-fanf-dane-mua-00 Tony Finch