IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-00 comments

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com> Tue, 22 April 2014 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <cloos@jhcloos.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395441A025D for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.273
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.273 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xdW1VmwzAjz6 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ore.jhcloos.com (ore.jhcloos.com [198.147.23.85]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF251A028E for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ore.jhcloos.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 09D371DDCB; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:07:47 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jhcloos.com; s=ore14; t=1398204467; bh=YXvlZG2zcS6gnSfohZE3I1dgaqQe6O/SlN7hwMEw8X8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OZtMjo0KPUK/U7iINxJyUJ9rD6LXUjYFhRAb0nFVlTN5yRKjmrp4r5yfzS9B+/BSe QgoX9QOFTPta1bZtYwhl51AYOv8GlVw+m6Ys24Y6fWs3Ja5IPO3W9CEuD/Ru2DfyKI vs4LkNXzwg0M7r/tlfiRfHyYhI9GQ/AcpOyHhZoY=
Received: by carbon.jhcloos.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 42A886001D; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:02:40 +0000 (UTC)
From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <53564F63.2010008@redhat.com> (Petr Spacek's message of "Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:15:47 +0200")
References: <20140410175623.1767.25701.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <53562BA6.6010808@redhat.com> <53564F63.2010008@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAABAAAAAQAgMAAABinRfyAAAACVBMVEX///8ZGXBQKKnCrDQ3 AAAAJElEQVQImWNgQAAXzwQg4SKASgAlXIEEiwsSIYBEcLaAtMEAADJnB+kKcKioAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC
Copyright: Copyright 2014 James Cloos
OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6; url=https://jhcloos.com/public_key/0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6.asc
OpenPGP-Fingerprint: E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:02:39 -0400
Message-ID: <m3d2g9dntz.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Lines: 13
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Hashcash: 1:30:140422:pspacek@redhat.com::HzyXfXCQ0wQ2T1zE:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000O1fZL
X-Hashcash: 1:30:140422:dane@ietf.org::IuLdYfRfy69eWMcZ:000DyAiN
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/k8IoKZT_llt2XWkmkdvTJlOdbVo
Cc: dane@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-00 comments
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:07:59 -0000

>>>>> "PS" == Petr Spacek <pspacek@redhat.com> writes:

PS> What about CERT RR?
PS> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4398#section-2.1 contains this (beside others):

Cert uses the user portion of the email address as-is, and therefor only
supports usernames which fit unalterred in dns.

Some aspects of the rfc are a bit terse.  Can you tell, for IPGP,
whether the length octet is a bit-lenght or an octet-length?  Or
which data, exactly, is digested to create the key tag?

James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email