Re: [dane] SMIMEA, record locating as in OPENPGPKEY

Florian Kirstein <fk@sys4.de> Fri, 10 July 2015 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <fk@sys4.de>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE841A8F51 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 06:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.838
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_47=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zzFHw5ckIX1k for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 06:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sys4.de (mail.sys4.de [IPv6:2001:1578:400:111::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97A8B1A8F4D for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 06:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sys4.de; h= in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:content-type :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject:from:from :date:date; s=mail201310; t=1436534895; x=1438349296; bh=5Q2m6e9 PQ5UzuUy15r9YwL3o+oU4kOtovuOwkHbOWo0=; b=cej/jiTFRUJs4eIt0YSeA2+ uhflHqAoScaA/5UdiAZI4e/raw/gVPOchS3wGXVMUi8SJlVg82ExMlXLfno37l+O n4/nDrDlyDvWo5UWcDsLXP1fhou4Al9T6dQesBGQzAYhlqpNxCsEYPZ7qRR6g4e1 omdf8IueNussiwNPbjszA1KaqvVYyheKWiUgC4Y4fWPRqra5MHg/SzKeEIfbvrjw w9zPd21dc03mD8j5kPC9zcGop3LJPDecRWRYn1dXSD0aM2up8SnE21UE1L484kN1 nf5pShx1f3T4ZuMfpOEGNdf+OMQOHJ6hKgSWK8pNvSoycE30F9vRGGkmlK043Vw= =
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sys4.de
Received: from sys4.de (mail.sys4.de [194.126.158.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sys4.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3mSZv335Hyz86 for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:28:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:28:14 +0200
From: Florian Kirstein <fk@sys4.de>
To: dane@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150710132814.GA18811@sys4.de>
References: <D1C30E78.12D99%gwiley@verisign.com> <2A56BF41-3B75-48E1-930D-3A3C43E3385A@powerdns.com> <84E597D7-932E-4E25-B97C-FF84267F3891@verisign.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <84E597D7-932E-4E25-B97C-FF84267F3891@verisign.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/m4iMNKs4TDA6X6DyfifvNdA6n6M>
Subject: Re: [dane] SMIMEA, record locating as in OPENPGPKEY
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:28:20 -0000

Hi,

> To be fair, I think I counted about 10 people on the list who urged to proceed with the SMIMEA draft.  In this case, I think the perfect is the enemy of the good.

I would count myself as 11th there, but those people voted against
delaying SMIMEA for another year, not for pushing without discussions.

There indeed are quite some points in heavy discussion about the
localpart lookup mechanism and I am pretty sure there will be an update
to the OPENPGPKEY draft in this respect soon. I would wait with updating
the SMIMEA draft in this respect until that point. 

Of course the option Olafur just mentioned, simply referencing the
OPENPGPKEY standard there, also would be OK. But copy&pasting the current,
possibly soon-to-be changed version, no.

The more important point to advance the draft is the assignment of a RRtype.
Viktor pointet out that a requirement for that is the settling on the
RRDATA format. This is different for SMIMEA (more like TLSA than
OPENPGPKEY) so the question would be: does anybody see any problems
on that side, or can we consider that agreed?

Greetings,
Florian

-- 
[*] sys4 AG

http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64
Franziskanerstrasse 15, 81669 Muenchen

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Muenchen, Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 199263
Vorstand: Patrick Ben Koetter, Marc Schiffbauer
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Florian Kirstein