[dane] regarding my previous draft-ietf-dane-ops-14 comments

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 05 August 2015 08:17 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7332D1B2DB1 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 01:17:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJ0ApcLngxos for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 01:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227731B2DA4 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 01:17:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3mmQm64VxDz3NG for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:17:10 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mx.nohats.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca header.i=@nohats.ca header.b=SyMuALF2
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DLkgwrZY8bj9 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:17:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:17:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15AD80042 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 04:17:08 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1438762628; bh=f/ntqZ/AktrH7sshqim4KpmHnFhrHzbLC97js6DvuuU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=SyMuALF26WVAm1hImGq2xLK5Z0IkiJReEqS2HQNl4mzc0MLYn9uriaiW8tO8Jah10 ecO1IDu+0YilStggzy1QBvjTr/vAO0/Pbc//+V9hIyWB/5rej7JLZCFMzbttAMcsFy HON8q2bMWu5RfDR/8uMxwm7pAnEREWAyOUMULozk=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.15.1/8.15.1/Submit) with ESMTP id t758H8od009042 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 04:17:08 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 04:17:08 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1508050415000.1451@bofh.nohats.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/y_yfnWmoG2Tl-vFrJTSdJ6RKN7o>
Subject: [dane] regarding my previous draft-ietf-dane-ops-14 comments
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 08:17:14 -0000

Hi,

After a phone conversation with Viktor, he convinced me the current text is
actually good and my previous objections were my misinterpretations.

So I'm in favour of the document in its current form.

Paul