IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7929 (4796)

Paul Wouters <pwouters@redhat.com> Thu, 08 September 2016 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <pwouters@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE79812B196 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.41
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.41 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wr7G2OmgW2Px for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7834012B353 for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 06:21:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C20861E73; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 13:21:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from thinkpad.nohats.ca (vpn-232-31.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.232.31]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u88DL8PV010263; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 09:21:08 -0400
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, warren@kumari.net, ogud@ogud.com
References: <20160908082056.39306B80ABD@rfc-editor.org>
From: Paul Wouters <pwouters@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <403d4d1e-b79e-52b5-38c9-b6f97c047511@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 09:21:07 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160908082056.39306B80ABD@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Thu, 08 Sep 2016 13:21:11 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/zP6aHezL38z4ER-WP3YtzKhJ4T0>
Cc: dkg@fifthhorseman.net, dane@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7929 (4796)
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 13:30:51 -0000

On 09/08/2016 04:20 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7929,
> "DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Bindings for OpenPGP".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7929&eid=4796
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
> 
> Section: 3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    6.  The domain name (the "right-hand side" of the email address,
>        called the "domain" in [RFC5322]) is appended to the result of
>        step 2 to complete the prepared domain name.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    6.  The domain name (the "right-hand side" of the email address,
>        called the "domain" in [RFC5322]) is appended to the result of
>        step 5 to complete the prepared domain name.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Technically, it should be step 5, not step 2: after step 2, there is no _openpgpkey label in the composed domain name.  step 5 adds the _openpgpkey label.
> 


This errata is correct. The original text did not have the intermediary steps listed as such, and no one spotted referenced number when the numbering changed :(

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email