[Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter,
Arashmid Akhavain <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com> Tue, 05 May 2026 10:40 UTC
Return-Path: <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dawn@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dawn@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1308FE937BFB for <dawn@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 03:40:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1777977601; bh=+LIgg7h+pWg5TF24EdgsdwWsiucShH1CT13RemJYQGg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To; b=M+U1FkWKYgH4r8zC40LBAMxDB8AQfaOc+1ChgYHdyrCgnjRu0WRGq7KdZ2ZITW3/s WTR+pgR2omTAzcOnuIs8x2t3l9zXaDaVugA+nD35zZm4acBoFt+hYk7MOGvQT975Oc QWq57jjoJw4bGap01dkUgW2hPI2emU1jmvAI38n0=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.496
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.496 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_HAS_TINYURL=3.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o9FYprkH7Acb for <dawn@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 03:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99366E937BEB for <dawn@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 03:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.224.107]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4g8w3d6KB4zHnH8X for <dawn@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 18:38:53 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100011.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.174.247]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 629BD40584 for <dawn@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 May 2026 18:39:49 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ytopeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.184.17.227) by lhrpeml100011.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1748.39; Tue, 5 May 2026 11:39:29 +0100
Received: from ytopeml500001.china.huawei.com (7.184.16.223) by ytopeml100001.china.huawei.com (7.184.17.227) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 5 May 2026 06:39:28 -0400
Received: from ytopeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.184.16.223]) by ytopeml500001.china.huawei.com ([7.184.16.223]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Tue, 5 May 2026 06:39:28 -0400
From: Arashmid Akhavain <arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>, Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "dawn@ietf.org" <dawn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter,
Thread-Index: AQHc12uaU04bCDDIQUaakyLmCvdKh7X1iBcAgAD4JoCACMQmYA==
Date: Tue, 05 May 2026 10:39:27 +0000
Message-ID: <32ac2d8a045441b3964943f12ca31ad6@huawei.com>
References: <05ae01dcd342$e3f6d920$abe48b60$@olddog.co.uk> <CO6PR13MB5355182462BED52A6D145100852B2@CO6PR13MB5355.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <077701dcd43f$8fd19ee0$af74dca0$@olddog.co.uk> <CO6PR13MB5355EFC54413968DF08EF76685342@CO6PR13MB5355.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <001801dcd779$f0f49e10$d2ddda30$@tsinghua.org.cn> <CO6PR13MB5355363BBA2898A6A7D3F5ED85342@CO6PR13MB5355.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR13MB5355363BBA2898A6A7D3F5ED85342@CO6PR13MB5355.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.48.243.139]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_32ac2d8a045441b3964943f12ca31ad6huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: C63Q2XOWUSPJH3BVT6WQXZTFV6H7CA34
X-Message-ID-Hash: C63Q2XOWUSPJH3BVT6WQXZTFV6H7CA34
X-MailFrom: arashmid.akhavain@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter,
List-Id: "The list is for discussion of the scope, use cases, requirements, and solutions for discovery of entities (e.g., tasks, AI agents, or endpoints) using IETF technologies." <dawn.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dawn/vqdDLrGWK6CfjpkmvbP9EWWE-xc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dawn>
List-Help: <mailto:dawn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dawn-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dawn@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dawn-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dawn-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Linda, I think it is best if we stay away from solutions at this point. Having said that, I think DNS plays a role in discovery solution space, but DAWN scope is not limited to DNS based solutions. Arashmid From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com> Sent: 29 April 2026 12:34 To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>; adrian@olddog.co.uk; dawn@ietf.org Subject: [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Is DAWN only limited to DNS based discovery? Linda From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn<mailto:wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2026 6:46 PM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>>; adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>; dawn@ietf.org<mailto:dawn@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [Dawn] Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Hi, Linda: The attachment-related information and the discovery mechanism should fall within the scope of DMSC, which adopts a gateway-based approach for multi-agent collaboration. We cannot expect all the mentioned entities ("tasks, workloads (cf. WIMSE), endpoints (cf. CoRE), services, AI agents") to hold complete attachment-related information. In fact, the DNS-based discovery mechanism (DAWN), which is more suitable for the above entities, is obviously different from the gateway-based approach (DMSC). Aijun From: forwardingalgorithm@ietf.org<mailto:forwardingalgorithm@ietf.org> [mailto:forwardingalgorithm@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2026 8:03 AM To: adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>; dawn@ietf.org<mailto:dawn@ietf.org> Subject: [Dawn] Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian, Thanks for the detailed link for the DAWN proposed charter. I think it is really useful to have a home for discussing discovery for a broad class of "entities". I have a couple of comments on the current scope and terminology. First, the charter states: "Discovery: A process by which an entity can find another entity... The purpose of this work effort is limited to just this element." It would be helpful to clarify what information is expected to be returned by discovery. Existing systems, such as Google's A2A Agent Card, already include endpoint information that allows a client to contact the agent. However, an endpoint URL alone does not ensure that the communication path is reachable, policy-compliant, or optimal. Therefore, I suggest the charter clarify that discovery may include basic communication properties, such as endpoint identifiers, URI/FQDN, supported protocols, and security requirements, while reachability verification, path selection, and communication optimization remain out of scope. Second, agents may be dynamically attached to different access routers, gateways, or ingress points over time. Therefore, discovery may need to return attachment related properties in addition to static endpoint information. Such properties can help indicate where and how an entity is currently attached, and can provide the useful information for future routing or control-plane mechanisms to exchange attachment details and support more optimal path selection when attachment changes dynamically. Therefore, I suggest adding a scoped work item on the attachment properties, for example: Define how entities expose attachment related properties, including endpoint identifiers, supported protocols, attachment point identifiers, and domain information, and how such properties can be made available to discovery systems in a consistent and interoperable manner. This would still stay within the discovery scope, i.e., defining what attachment related information is available to discovery systems. Best regards, Linda -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2026 4:11 PM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>> Subject: RE: [Dawn] Early heads-up on planned BoF request Hi Linda, I hate long URLs in text emails that wrap. But I hate HTML emails even more! Not too hard to see what you should have done to fix the problem, but here is a tiny URL that might help you: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftinyurl.com%2F2238mxn7&data=05%7C02%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ccafa223024b5446cd45808dea256b429%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639126690523559245%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UsDI41r%2FUgjk8gvn9s7e4MkHPAmAhmc0sB4jdLVDhYY%3D&reserved=0<https://tinyurl.com/2238mxn7> Adrian -----Original Message----- From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com<mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>> Sent: 24 April 2026 19:53 To: adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk> Subject: RE: [Dawn] Early heads-up on planned BoF request Adrian, I can't find the document under this link 404 Page error: broad description of the work topic at https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdanielkinguk%2Fdiscovery%2Fblob%2Fmain%2FDAWN%2520Work%2520Descriptio&data=05%7C02%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ccafa223024b5446cd45808dea256b429%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639126690524371108%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=CLsgfj7sFAdsUoPVKkc%2BrRqzdSZwRA3bgnyPhL92KLg%3D&reserved=0<https://github.com/danielkinguk/discovery/blob/main/DAWN%20Work%20Descriptio> n.md and I expect that that will provide some of the text for the charter. Linda -----Original Message----- From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2026 10:02 AM To: 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org>> Cc: dawn@ietf.org<mailto:dawn@ietf.org> Subject: [Dawn] Early heads-up on planned BoF request Hi IESG, Per the entry in the "Important Dates" page for IETF 126: > Working Group and BOF scheduling begins. To request a Working Group > session, use the IETF Meeting Session Request Tool. If you are working > on a BOF request, it is highly recommended to tell the IESG now by > sending an email to iesg@ietf.org<mailto:iesg@ietf.org> to get advance help with the request. So this is me letting you know that we are working on a BoF request for "Discovery of Agents, Workloads, and Named entities (DAWN)" We currently have three I-Ds (see https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdawn&data=05%7C02%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ccafa223024b5446cd45808dea256b429%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639126690524479290%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UeyXwtSSjstj1mZJqR8F3Gd7LQORyj%2Ftu9VxIUBSLmg%3D&reserved=0<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/dawn>) and plans for a couple more. But more work is needed on them. We also have a broad description of the work topic at https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdanielkinguk%2Fdiscovery%2Fblob%2Fmain%2FDAWN%2520Work%2520Descriptio&data=05%7C02%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ccafa223024b5446cd45808dea256b429%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639126690524552470%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zoOl7N4Wv%2B7HpQl7NLzYHEEMosPhbPJH9rO62VNonAg%3D&reserved=0<https://github.com/danielkinguk/discovery/blob/main/DAWN%20Work%20Descriptio> n.md and I expect that that will provide some of the text for the charter. There is solution-specific work available at: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-mozleywilliams-dnsop-dnsaid%2F&data=05%7C02%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ccafa223024b5446cd45808dea256b429%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639126690524620573%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PbZhiOeH2l154akgvc6zlw8Lp47ojRzxUelJDdZq5K4%3D&reserved=0<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mozleywilliams-dnsop-dnsaid/> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-mozley-aidiscovery%2F&data=05%7C02%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7Ccafa223024b5446cd45808dea256b429%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C639126690524689900%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=2qj0zLep5MnYIc5q4Kkp6uJ3MZ4MXGicXTYmfjugaNI%3D&reserved=0<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mozley-aidiscovery/> This work was dispatched at DNS-Dispatch at IETF 125 with the result: > Organise a BoF, also to further clarify the problem space and approach > the DNSOP AD for further guidance. While these I-Ds are focused on AI and have decided on a specific solution space, we believe they fit nicely within the DAWN remit and demonstrate both that a solution using existing IETF technology is possible and that there is serious interest in working on the problem. The proponents would love to know which Area this fits in (ART because it is application-oriented, INT because DNS may be the solution?) and which AD would like to work with us on this. Best, Adrian _______________________________________________ Dawn mailing list -- dawn@ietf.org<mailto:dawn@ietf.org> To unsubscribe send an email to dawn-leave@ietf.org<mailto:dawn-leave@ietf.org>
- [Dawn] Early heads-up on planned BoF request Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Linda Dunbar
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Aijun Wang
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Linda Dunbar
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Aijun Wang
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Aijun Wang
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Hesham Moussa
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Linda Dunbar
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Wes Hardaker
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Linda Dunbar
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Linda Dunbar
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Jim Mozley
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Arashmid Akhavain
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Arashmid Akhavain
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Arashmid Akhavain
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Arashmid Akhavain
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Aijun Wang
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Arashmid Akhavain
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Linda Dunbar
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Discovery Solution Space Behcet Sarikaya
- [Dawn] Re: Discovery Solution Space Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Arashmid Akhavain
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Aijun Wang
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Jim Mozley
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Arashmid Akhavain
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Jim Mozley
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Re: Comments to the DAWN proposed charter, Adrian Farrel
- [Dawn] Re: Discovery Solution Space Wes Hardaker