Re: [dbound] No meeting planned for IETF 95
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 09 February 2016 01:38 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCF21B3F18 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:38:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GdY4DEu-sGeP for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [50.116.54.116]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6605B1B3F15 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1216810985 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 01:38:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rJAivZWIcpyE for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 01:38:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (unknown [107.72.98.107]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1289A10982 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 01:38:02 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:38:00 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dbound@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20160209013800.GC52082@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <CABuGu1rB+8TYCdF49XVE0f+8Xc5SW=F3UoQiTmuX37GC60CjCQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160129024834.48514.qmail@ary.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160129024834.48514.qmail@ary.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/45ubqyD-6Bpjm5p_JD2oJJ78Eac>
Subject: Re: [dbound] No meeting planned for IETF 95
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 01:38:07 -0000
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:48:34AM -0000, John Levine wrote: > At this point we have three proposals: > > draft-deccio-dbound-organizational-domain-policy-01.txt > draft-levine-orgboundary-04.txt > draft-yao-dbound-dns-solution-02.txt Actually, I thought we had four, since JeffH and I had one to. We let it expire because the WG was supposed to be working on the use case document. I confess that I dislike all the above three, for reasons I've outlined previously; among them, > Is it OK that Deccio uses a new _odup top level domain? No > Does Levine need to address some of the more complex cases that Deccio does? Yes > Is it useful that Yao's design can refer queries to PSL like text files? No. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
- [dbound] No meeting planned for IETF 95 Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dbound] No meeting planned for IETF 95 Casey Deccio
- Re: [dbound] No meeting planned for IETF 95 Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dbound] No meeting planned for IETF 95 John Levine
- Re: [dbound] No meeting planned for IETF 95 Casey Deccio
- Re: [dbound] No meeting planned for IETF 95 Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dbound] No meeting planned for IETF 95 Andrew Sullivan