IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dbound] draft-brotman-rdbd

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 01 April 2019 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4B91201B1 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:39:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=xw7YtWt2; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=F7pxF+Wl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E2FFS8PUD3GI for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19DD3120502 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 56952 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2019 20:39:43 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=de76.5ca2770f.k1904; bh=v+DbTskWAjK5OTdevx201iwMB0iIPIJ/gbU6sxTBa7k=; b=xw7YtWt2WUceSIEa1aubxi5GptfWZbuXm7zKMsF4/1+xjtiseHVNA3K0uVpPsX6EGz+YhSeUnBJL3FuWI5/bWCikEpibsCrsoVTCIDCfxQTQHr9WPTFPkLYIgWy8m2j53k+blZaCsUIyapQQcOMd4jYn4aSEu8m11rWPcb8RVL0NwP6DbWYmi+XNv6PTzl4Qw0ls084OMEDQ/Ctl31JTWjbxuJ38dsyJsp0qpy8oN6OcgNj0YJVklATPyGOyxDDR
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=de76.5ca2770f.k1904; bh=v+DbTskWAjK5OTdevx201iwMB0iIPIJ/gbU6sxTBa7k=; b=F7pxF+WlSRhuwgkecko3VuokLpga+gISd9SP1x9dcZrhQwnyycIXaorEBBG1aeiO/nf+IYqeLxa4Sg244FVgj+jLP88/uZ6xJ8DLK0xQYh1xQm4omBSxANVipyFSGh3zCbwifz2GD7e0NgG276+cls5zs+QDsGAof0ll6kkPeZAsTBkVcn+ADdfdr0Ikkhlwlh45X5OsVyb716qOrJ0NctHZOjZq6UF4gZQ/AQPCGmLcqrpd+bKd9CmAwr03RREV
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 01 Apr 2019 20:39:43 -0000
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 16:39:42 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1904011639000.13414@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: dbound@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <71b8a4dd-8bd6-c24c-e8fd-e76c27bee06a@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <20190401161900.764062011356DA@ary.qy> <71b8a4dd-8bd6-c24c-e8fd-e76c27bee06a@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/L4Ey3FEPRF85DgXcWcx3H14nFnc>
Subject: Re: [dbound] draft-brotman-rdbd
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 20:40:06 -0000

>> As far as I can tell nobody does anything like that for DKIM keys.
>
> I don't know if anyone does, but wouldn't be surprised if some 
> anti-abuse folks reacted to a mail provider switching from one 
> long-lived key selector to a new one not seen anywhere before. (But I'm 
> speculating there, others who do that kind of thing for real would need 
> to confirm that or not.)

That's more likely to be taken as a positive signal, that they finally got 
their key rotation working.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email