Re: [Dbound] Can/should organizational boundaries include URIs? [x-post from websec]

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Tue, 03 February 2015 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131561A887D for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:38:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V6C6c_o2qN8o for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:38:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 450661A8720 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:38:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (unknown [50.189.173.0]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A7D38A035; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 22:38:42 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 17:38:40 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Message-ID: <20150203223840.GI1018@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <CAL1pEUKoQhJNh-DL6PJgtWZxyLAz7t90pxZaOq=tDyC35HzHhw@mail.gmail.com> <877fvyaja6.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <20150203215939.GF1018@mx1.yitter.info> <54D14718.3050805@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54D14718.3050805@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/jjd7Qy0qYIJao4Jui1pPAoLbeFg>
Cc: dbound@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dbound] Can/should organizational boundaries include URIs? [x-post from websec]
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:38:44 -0000

On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:09:28PM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
> I don't recall seeing a non-technical, non-acronym description of what
> the desired user-level functionality is, that drives wanting to store
> URIs or the like.  Can someone either proffer or point to some text of
> that sort?
> 

I doubt it.  I tried, though not hard enough, in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sullivan-domain-origin-assert-02.
The history of that document might be useful (and I freely admit might
not be).

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com