Re: [dbound] Requirements for administrative boundary data sources?
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 12 April 2016 23:43 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dbound@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3473712DA50 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jmi5F46b8b50 for <dbound@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0771D12D9F0 for <dbound@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 71319 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2016 23:43:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 12 Apr 2016 23:43:26 -0000
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 23:43:04 -0000
Message-ID: <20160412234304.1032.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dbound@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAH8yC8kJwauQ9Y5ym_4cMfnwfWFgjqJptZ-GfcgvjpycOY8iFA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dbound/oll4jmaJvZLeEZV0SExdJKa8BGs>
Cc: noloader@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dbound] Requirements for administrative boundary data sources?
X-BeenThere: dbound@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS tree bounds <dbound.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dbound/>
List-Post: <mailto:dbound@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dbound>, <mailto:dbound-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 23:43:29 -0000
>Forgive my ignorance, but has a centralized vs decentralized model >been decided upon? No. When you read the drafts, you should have noticed the part in mine that said it'd work either for each domain publishing it's own info, or for it all to be published under one domain name. R's, John
- [dbound] Requirements for administrative boundary… Jeffrey Walton
- Re: [dbound] Requirements for administrative boun… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [dbound] Requirements for administrative boun… Jeffrey Walton
- Re: [dbound] Requirements for administrative boun… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dbound] Requirements for administrative boun… Jothan Frakes
- Re: [dbound] Requirements for administrative boun… Jeffrey Walton
- Re: [dbound] Requirements for administrative boun… John Levine
- Re: [dbound] Requirements for administrative boun… Andrew Sullivan