IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dc] feedback for http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dc/current/msg00038.html

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Wed, 04 January 2012 05:37 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8060E21F85BA for <dc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:37:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.462, BAYES_00=-2.599, CN_BODY_46=0.256, EXTRA_MPART_TYPE=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_210=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rYOX-1LfH0SY for <dc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:37:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94F721F8583 for <dc@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:37:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LX9000Y0EAOLB@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for dc@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:37:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LX900K4SEABBJ@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for dc@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:37:36 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGE28206; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:37:36 +0800
Received: from SZXEML420-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.159) by szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:37:32 +0800
Received: from SZXEML526-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.37]) by szxeml420-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.159]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:37:16 +0800
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:37:15 +0000
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <OF8F297787.C131233F-ON48257974.0025C3CD-48257974.00266B2A@zte.com.cn>
X-Originating-IP: [10.212.244.192]
To: "shao.weixiang@zte.com.cn" <shao.weixiang@zte.com.cn>
Message-id: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C243768@szxeml526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/related; boundary="Boundary_(ID_+JExYkw9diA3jcAnk4dnZQ)"; type="multipart/alternative"
Content-language: en-US
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Thread-topic: feedback for http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dc/current/msg00038.html
Thread-index: AQHMxS5KW9fYi9y31UWcalHS7+EqLJX7uYuA
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <OF8F297787.C131233F-ON48257974.0025C3CD-48257974.00266B2A@zte.com.cn>
Cc: "dc@ietf.org" <dc@ietf.org>, "vumip1@gmail.com" <vumip1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dc] feedback for http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dc/current/msg00038.html
X-BeenThere: dc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Data Center Mailing List <dc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dc>, <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dc>
List-Post: <mailto:dc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dc>, <mailto:dc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 05:37:52 -0000

Dear Weixiang,
Happy New Year!

The authors actually had Cloud Brokerage included in version 00 of that draft http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-tsou-vrom-problem-statement-00.txt, but it seemed too early to include it in IETF so it was removed by version 02.
The CSB document came up like 10 days after version 00 of draft-tsou.
It seems draft-shao just put down the NIST specs into the draft, which is not quite the appropriate level for IETF. I do believe it could find a place but not in that shape. Also, assuming there is a CSB in the path, the only place it can go is in some data center somewhere, where else, a desktop?

Tina

From: shao.weixiang@zte.com.cn [mailto:shao.weixiang@zte.com.cn]
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 11:00 PM
To: Tina TSOU
Cc: vumip1@gmail.com; dc@ietf.org
Subject: feedback for http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dc/current/msg00038.html

The following draft on Cloud Service Broker is no related to http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-tsou-vrom-problem-statement-02.txt



http://www.ietf.org/staging/draft-shao-opsawg-cloud-service-broker-02.txt

draft-tsou-vrom-problem-statement-02 is just a problem statement about data center virtual resources operations and management.

A cloud broker can be in data center, or not. It is a new role in cloud ecosystem. By the way, the draft is a solution.
[cid:image001.jpg@01CCCA5F.D8D2F6B0]


Shao Weixiang 邵伟翔
Standard Development And Industry Relations Dept.

[cid:image002.jpg@01CCCA5F.D8D2F6B0]

Product R&D System

产品研发体系

E305,No.889,Bibo Rd,Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park,Pudong,Shanghai
P.R.China, 201203
Tel:+86-21-68896976
Mobile:+86-13916615817
Email:shao.weixiang@zte.com.cn

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status