IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dclc] Status of the group

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 27 May 2015 00:35 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B031B3358 for <dclc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wMtX10MGDoqo for <dclc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC0B1A1A3D for <dclc@irtf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2932; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432686956; x=1433896556; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=FbYQMQ9azxEodbZdB3J57xFuyRenVXdhDuq5ZGrhqk4=; b=ggUHGK+BHaKm7LFSeHh+3FpjwoMXppi/8HrK16SnQsOrszhjE7/g00SY HnmV8x9gQ7imlf2wLtaf3tS+7Hml4+wnKqTtVB3ci0cLUxcFJPhBjxgQ9 UC0AszeVRLM0ZlwhSvmnbhP9SrZD8lkMKVFPsENmoqdgOwwTpRUKIir0N M=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AfBADLEGVV/4ENJK1cgxCBMgbDLQmHUAKBQTgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCIBAQEDAXkFBwQCAQgRBAEBAScHMhQJCAIEDgUODIgKCM1cAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4o4gQKFBQcGgxGBFgWQTII8ghKBQ4c6ly8jg3hvgUaBAQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,502,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="153502760"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 May 2015 00:35:55 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4R0Ztsj011342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 May 2015 00:35:55 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.134]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 26 May 2015 19:35:55 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Hui Deng <denghui@chinamobile.com>
Thread-Topic: [Dclc] Status of the group
Thread-Index: AQHQmBUXwXj1tHbZVk6JxXP6CoZSCQ==
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 00:35:54 +0000
Message-ID: <3C51B145-54A8-458F-828E-7D9458C22CC9@cisco.com>
References: <D25735B9-0346-43B9-9E86-BCE162DC9572@netapp.com> <25089274-843E-41D8-B486-E0900FC52A7F@cisco.com> <004501d09810$84260fd0$8c722f70$@com>
In-Reply-To: <004501d09810$84260fd0$8c722f70$@com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.24.163.30]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_482E8340-AEC0-4157-9256-1B19168A3EF0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dclc/PmqwqyFGzXlieIBC70ytTElyMPY>
Cc: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, dclc <dclc@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dclc] Status of the group
X-BeenThere: dclc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of Data Center Latency Control <dclc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dclc>, <mailto:dclc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dclc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dclc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dclc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dclc>, <mailto:dclc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 00:35:58 -0000

> On May 26, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Hui Deng <denghui@chinamobile.com> wrote:
> 
> Yesterday, Lingli just had a new baby(girl).

Congratulations to her!

> I would suggest that dclc could consider to meet in Nov. By that time, Lingli will come back to IETF.

OK, I'll request a side room during that meeting. My previous statement stands, however. Since March of last year, it has been Lingli, myself, and a couple of speakers. When we have been aware of people putting together papers, they have declined to share their research pending publication, and when the publication came out, we haven't heard from them. If folks are looking for a venue to discuss and push a research agenda, we need for them to step up and say so - and the list would be a great place to start. If they wish the meetings were in some other venue, we need for them to step up and say so. If people have another opinion, we need for them to step up and say so.

Right now, it's crickets. No news is not good news.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dclc [mailto:dclc-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred)
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:04 AM
> To: Eggert, Lars
> Cc: dclc
> Subject: Re: [Dclc] Status of the group
> 
> 
>> On May 26, 2015, at 4:37 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> wrote:
>> 
>> there hasn't been any activity in this group in the last six months. I'm wondering if we should let it fizzle out? Or is someone feeling sufficiently motivated to take the flag from Fred and Lingli, put the energy in and make this happen?
> 
> For the record, I have not asked for a meeting room in Prague, although I imagine we can get a side room for the price of asking. That is on the basis of how hard it has been to get people to talk about what they are doing. Happy to revive the work, or to see it revived by someone else, but I need people to step up.
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email