[Dclc] Fwd: Re: Toronto meeting

Lingli,

If appropriate I could also present our work on 
Network Performance Isolation in Data Centres 
using Congestion Policing (needs 10mins).
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-briscoe-conex-data-centre-02>

I've presented it before, but only in the ConEx WG.
<http://www.bobbriscoe.net/presents/1307ietf/1307-conex-data-centre.pdf>
And it's been redesigned so guests don't need 
ConEx any more. And they don't even need ECN 
either - any non-ECN packets are tunnelled 
between the sending and receiving hypervisor.

Bob

>Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 10:20:37 +0100
>To: =?gb2312?B?tcvB6cDyL0xpbmdsaSBEZW5n?= <denglingli@chinamobile.com>
>From: Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
>Subject: Re: [Dclc] Toronto meeting
>Cc: "'dclc'" <dclc@irtf.org>, Richard 
>Scheffenegger <rs@netapp.com>, Mirja KUEHLEWIND 
><mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
>
>Lingli,
>
>Myself, Richard Scheffeneger (NetApp) & Mirja 
>Kuehlewind (Stuttgart Uni) are about to post a 
>revised draft on our proposed approach to replace TCP's ECN feedback.
>
>It would probably be worth a reasonably long 
>slot to present this (20mins or more?). We will 
>also be asking to present it in the tcpm where 
>it addresses a chartered IETF work item, but we 
>ought to present its "research enablement" angle in more depth in the IRTF.
>
>The original problem we addressed was motivated 
>by the flawed feedback scheme in DCTCP and the needs of ConEx.
>
>However, we have designed it to be a generic 
>feedback reflector that will allow new sender 
>behaviours to be deployed unilaterally without 
>having to deploy new receiver behaviour each 
>time too. We're looking for feedback on whether 
>it is generic enough for all the ideas people 
>might have for using it (I'm working on 5 myself).
>
>
>Bob
>
>At 06:38 18/06/2014, Songhaibin (A) wrote:
>>Dear Lingli,
>>
>>Thant you for organizing this meeting. I'm 
>>preparing a relative draft on TCP parameter 
>>control and would like to present at the DCLC meeting.
>>
>>Best Regards!
>>-Haibin
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Dclc [mailto:dclc-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of µËÁéÀò/Lingli Deng
>> > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 1:06 PM
>> > To: 'dclc'
>> > Cc: 'Fred Baker (fred)'
>> > Subject: Re: [Dclc] Toronto meeting
>> >
>> > Guys,
>> >
>> > Let's start preparing for our first meeting. ^-^ The following topics are
>> > summarized from an earlier thread
>> > (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dclc/current/msg00003.html).
>> >
>> > 1, Production data sharing
>> > 2, Problem statement/analysis
>> > 3, Solutions
>> > 4, Research/experimental tools
>> >
>> > Please kindly feedback your interests and suggestions.
>> >
>> > BTW, if you are preparing a 
>> draft/presentation for dclc@irtf next month, it
>> > would be great to let us know now.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Lingli
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Dclc [mailto:dclc-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Eggert, Lars
>> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:09 PM
>> > > To: dclc
>> > > Subject: [Dclc] Toronto meeting
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > please operate under the assumption that you'll have a room for a side
>> > > meeting in Toronto. It's time to discuss what to *do* with that slot.
>> > >
>> > > Lars
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Dclc mailing list
>> > Dclc@irtf.org
>> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dclc
>>_______________________________________________
>>Dclc mailing list
>>Dclc@irtf.org
>>https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dclc
>
>________________________________________________________________
>Bob Briscoe,                                                  BT

________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe,                                                  BT 