Re: [dcp] sequence numbers on resend
Eddie Kohler <kohler@icir.org> Tue, 07 May 2002 17:05 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA15959 for <dcp-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:05:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id NAA12193 for dcp-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:05:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA12184; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:05:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA12149 for <dcp@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:05:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from coyote.icir.org (coyote.icir.org [192.150.187.37]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA15954 for <dcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:04:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from coyote.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by coyote.icir.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g47H4x610034; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:04:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kohler@coyote.icir.org)
Message-Id: <200205071704.g47H4x610034@coyote.icir.org>
To: "Patrick R. McManus" <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
cc: dcp@ietf.org
Reply-To: dcp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dcp] sequence numbers on resend
In-Reply-To: Message from "Patrick R. McManus" <mcmanus@ducksong.com> of "Tue, 07 May 2002 11:33:40 EDT." <20020507153340.GA2453@ducksong.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 10:04:59 -0700
From: Eddie Kohler <kohler@icir.org>
Sender: dcp-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dcp-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Datagram Control Protocol <dcp.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dcp@ietf.org
> 4.2 defines that a sequence number increases by one (modulo 2^24) for > every packet sent. > > The spec isn't clear to me whether retransmissions (e.g. request and > response) should follow this guideline. You're right. We need to be clearer about retransmissions at the start of a connection. My first instincts are: (1) DCCP-Responses are never retransmitted. If a Response is lost, the side that initiated the connection will retransmit the Request eventually. (2) I'm not sure it matters, in practice, whether retransmitted Requests have new sequence numbers. Therefore, for consistency, I would choose that they would. Eddie _______________________________________________ dcp mailing list dcp@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcp
- [dcp] Protocol Version number Alex Audu
- [dcp] Comments and Question Re: DCP drafts Patrick R. McManus
- Re: [dcp] Comments and Question Re: DCP drafts Eddie Kohler
- Re: [dcp] rcp-response packet reserved bits Eddie Kohler
- Re: [dcp] sequence numbers on resend Eddie Kohler
- Re: [dcp] sequence numbers on resend Mark Handley
- Re: [dcp] sequence numbers on resend Patrick R. McManus
- Re: [dcp] sequence numbers on resend Eddie Kohler
- Re: [dcp] sequence numbers on resend Patrick R. McManus
- Re: [dcp] sequence numbers on resend Mark Handley
- Re: [dcp] Protocol Version number Mark Handley