IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-00

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 19 May 2017 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B7A1294B5 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 May 2017 08:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.579
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.579 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t6eDe4aSPyzO for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 May 2017 08:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E32129484 for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 May 2017 08:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 80226 invoked from network); 19 May 2017 15:50:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 19 May 2017 15:50:28 -0000
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 15:50:06 -0000
Message-ID: <20170519155006.5267.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dcrup@ietf.org
Cc: rsalz@akamai.com
In-Reply-To: <b4089f9898264ce8a638605fcb1f93a8@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/-IJ6gJIaTYryPjba9TDGBfNEKUU>
Subject: Re: [Dcrup] draft-ietf-dcrup-dkim-crypto-00
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 15:50:31 -0000

In article <b4089f9898264ce8a638605fcb1f93a8@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> you write:
>use new ECC based signatures and also, if necessary as a middle step, approach how to do RSA 2K.  Given DNS TXT
>contraints, I think it makes sense to have RSA 2K be a separate document from "ECC for DKIM."
>
>Does this make sense to the WG members?

Given how short they both are, I'd like to keep them together for now.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email