[Dcrup] Did you get survey spam from VT students?

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Mon, 31 July 2017 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F68132739 for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:52:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WMoHA3anhjlD for <dcrup@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (w6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65E0513273B for <dcrup@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 70918 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2017 17:52:04 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=11504.597f6e44.k1707; bh=2RiTcoeguCNm5al82aAoB0VgWWWFPBzVdifSBAQxAbY=; b=SzJYZiSXPpg44FL0TyfnBFGphF2ZCX9vh+S0sTs3BVg6Fmc5GabUpmZlsKgIZnE3Fh48AdvC34noZrJUKJtCtfnSB+YZUVQ105tKYIQ3Cr7CjNH/ctefw3iSKbxeYQM0qvrjUsqkBKpIBLaTfrgaRqZ2IXGU4Xrgl+1+ZkbEC1C61NK1Kv6WjUivUy1/QaMv9MOzhwboZGft25D3jdsBCFnNDe+SGlb1Tuup2hIWKNVwcmfqj7J6OudVuoPg6pUt
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 31 Jul 2017 17:52:04 -0000
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:52:03 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707311348180.12986@ary.local>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: dcrup@ietf.org, dmarc@ietf.org
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dcrup/wa2EP3tLKSRLtjtgtMwXOK0j_fI>
Subject: [Dcrup] Did you get survey spam from VT students?
X-BeenThere: dcrup@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DKIM Crypto Update <dcrup.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dcrup/>
List-Post: <mailto:dcrup@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcrup>, <mailto:dcrup-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:52:11 -0000

I just got spam from a couple of Virginia Tech students with an 
impressively clueless "survey" about DKIM and DMARC usage.

If you got it, could you instead reply to their professor and the VT IRB 
pointing out that scraping people's addresses from mailing lists is 
unethical and, in many countries, illegal.

The multiple-choice question about DMARC usage did not include any options 
about DMARC causing more problems than it solved which (whether or not you 
agree that's the problem) tells us that they didn't do their homework.

I could just barely tolerate a survey sent to the relevant mailing lists, 
but scraping individual addresses is way beyond the pale.

Professor:  gangwang@vt.edu
IRB: moored@vt.edu, terrysparks@vt.edu, ctgreen@vt.edu


Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly