IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dd] last call on proposed charter to send to the IESG

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 09 April 2024 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF11C14F5F5 for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L7kqUFEte6Pm for <dd@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D2F8C14F603 for <dd@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:33:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01F402420E4A; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 17:33:11 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+F+LreYjWtGZAx1xUW-ZxxtqTMUfwnu4hOZZXrqB0njfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 18:33:11 +0100
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, dd@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AA9612D7-FEF1-4C4F-9DB8-30EFD6CFF62A@rfc1035.com>
References: <ybl1q7k93qt.fsf@wd.hardakers.net> <CADyWQ+F+LreYjWtGZAx1xUW-ZxxtqTMUfwnu4hOZZXrqB0njfA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dd/9HI0Ih_IpUj9JJBq7fEvgaOkJG0>
Subject: Re: [dd] last call on proposed charter to send to the IESG
X-BeenThere: dd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Delegation <dd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dd/>
List-Post: <mailto:dd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dd>, <mailto:dd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 17:33:19 -0000


> On 9 Apr 2024, at 01:32, Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I say ship it

+1

IMO the draft charter that has emerged is good enough. If it needs fine-tuning, that can be upwardly delegated to the IESG.

Paul and Wes deserve our thanks for tracking the discussions and updating the draft charter.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email