[dd] Re: DELEG and draft-ietf-deleg-requirements

[Petr Špaček <[e-mail]>]

On 12. 11. 25 8:30, Evan Hunt wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 10:47:02PM -0500, Dave Lawrence wrote:
>> Great, so have your authoritative server spin up its own means of
>> performing the synthesis.  This does not need to be specified in an
>> IETF wire protocol draft.
> 
> Fair enough, this doesn't have to be a MUST.  But how about a MAY, with
> guidance so that servers implementing synthesis do it the same way?

I don't see technical need to do it the same way. Registries are 
managing their namespace differently. Resolvers are not resolving the 
same way either...

If WG wants to do 'guidance' document let's create a new document just 
for this, please.

NS synthesis does not affect DELEG wire protocol at all so the base spec 
does not need to be caught in crossfire of bikesheding names for 
synthesized NS names and political questions of treading on someone 
else's turf/namespace when using these RRs.

-- 
Petr Špaček