Re: [decade] [appsdir] Apps review of DECADE drafts

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 19 January 2012 22:57 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: decade@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BBD21F857A; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:57:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.656
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aBymSZQjpzrU; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:57:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086B821F84FA; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:57:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-124.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.124]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6486B40058; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:06:56 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <4F189FD6.5020008@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:57:26 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Woundy, Richard" <Richard_Woundy@cable.comcast.com>
References: <1CA25301D2219F40B3AA37201F0EACD1150603A3@PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <1CA25301D2219F40B3AA37201F0EACD1150603A3@PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "'decade@ietf.org'" <decade@ietf.org>, "'appsdir@ietf.org'" <appsdir@ietf.org>, "'sm+ietf@elandsys.com'" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: [decade] [appsdir] Apps review of DECADE drafts
X-BeenThere: decade@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "To start the discussion on DECoupled Application Data Enroute, to discuss the in-network data storage for p2p applications and its access protocol" <decade.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/decade>
List-Post: <mailto:decade@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/decade>, <mailto:decade-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:57:30 -0000

Rich, thanks for letting us know!

On 1/19/12 3:48 PM, Woundy, Richard wrote:
> The document draft-ietf-decade-problem-statement-04 is held up due to a much deeper review I undertook as document shepherd. I need to communicate a lot of changes and questions back to the authors as a result of this review. I don't think this document is ready for your review at this time.
> 
> -- Rich
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: S Moonesamy [mailto:sm+ietf@elandsys.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 05:41 PM
> To: Haibin Song <haibin.song@huawei.com>; Woundy, Richard
> Cc: appsdir@ietf.org <appsdir@ietf.org>; decade@ietf.org <decade@ietf.org>
> Subject: RE: Apps review of DECADE drafts
> 
> Dear DECADE WG Chairs,
> 
> As I mentioned in a previous email, the Applications Area Directorate 
> has identified draft-ietf-decade-problem-statement-04 and 
> draft-ietf-decade-reqs-05 for review.  Could you please tell me when 
> the revision of draft-ietf-decade-problem-statement-04 will be submitted?
> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
> 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectorate
> 
> _______________________________________________
> appsdir mailing list
> appsdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/appsdir


-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/