Re: [decade] Open Issue-2 （draft "An HTTP-based DECADE Resource Protocol"）.

[Songhaibin <[e-mail]>]

Hi Danhua,

That’s a good point. I feel that’s the consensus in the mailing list.

-Haibin

From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Wangdanhua
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 4:50 PM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [decade] Open Issue-2 （draft "An HTTP-based DECADE Resource Protocol"）.

Hi all,

The following is another open issue left for “An HTTP-based DECADE Resource Protocol” (draft-wang-drp). We’re looking forward to your opinions and comments.

Since IETF 83rd in Pairs, we received a lot of comments on the defining of “REMOTE_GET_Object Message” from WG as well as mailing list discussion. The main idea includes 1) not introduce new HTTP headers, let alone new message types; 2) leverage the base functionality of a “non-transparent proxy” in DECADE, local DECADE Server to act as a non-transparent proxy when processing a request from a DECADE Client. We adopted WG’s suggestion and already updated the draft (see “Section 8. Remote_Get_Object Message” in the draft). We need more review and comments to see whether we could make further effort.

Thanks!

Best wishes,
Danhua