[Detnet] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-detnet-02-01: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 27 June 2022 06:11 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EA3C15A749; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 23:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.4.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <165631031332.10696.9627481429224065552@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 23:11:53 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/3maml1FP9HjhtqvCglry9ztuok0>
Subject: [Detnet] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-detnet-02-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 06:11:53 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-detnet-02-01: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-detnet/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Very little change in the charter but it seems important.

Just wondering whether "over Layer 3" is still relevant and applies to all given examples:
```
and packet treatment
(including, for example, forwarding, service protection, and queuing) over
Layer 3.
```

Regards

-éric