[Detnet] Robert Wilton's Yes on draft-ietf-detnet-yang-19: (with COMMENT)

[Robert Wilton via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-detnet-yang-19: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-yang/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Authors,

Thanks for this draft and for standardising another IETF YANG module.  I think
that the detailed examples (and diagrams) will likely be particularly helpful.

I only have a couple of trivial comments, otherwise is all looked good to me.

Minor level comments:

(1) p 3, sec 4.  DetNet YANG Module

     In the MPLS cases once encapsulated, the IP 6-tuple
   parameters may not be required to be programmed again.  In the IP
   case, without encapsulation, various IP flow id parameters must be
   configured along the flow path.

Perhaps include a reference to where 6-tuple is defined.

Nit level comments:

(2) p 5, sec 4.3.  DetNet Forwarding Sub-layer YANG Attributes

   *  Since this model programs the data plane existing explicit route
      mechanisms can be reused.

Perhaps "... the data place, existing ..."

Regards,
Rob