IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Detnet] Re: WG adoption poll: draft-eckert-detnet-tcqf-12

Jing Wang <wangjingjc@chinamobile.com> Mon, 05 January 2026 10:39 UTC

Return-Path: <wangjingjc@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F41BA2CDDD2 for <detnet@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 02:39:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=chinamobile.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nrvElMHI9leW for <detnet@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 02:39:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta6.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.139]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58422A2CDDC9 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2026 02:39:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chinamobile.com; s=default; l=0; h=from:subject:message-id:to:mime-version; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; b=k6l6tI35SjKbzfXCSBUBLqCHVBMzkzj47AMXqnMB1lmz4aP+McRb4sKo9M2d/IA/jGmCyBQQRBfMN St9M/ZUjHJkUrfJZUo+O3Cd+A1CHsKG2KiZbSBDVX4ytyvgf9yY0vNPklxrLESNK2PsU7kTVQ1s5aN Q3Xqoau6hRtSZJDE=
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee1695b94d99c7-9c3d3; Mon, 05 Jan 2026 18:39:22 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee1695b94d99c7-9c3d3
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from LAPTOP-5GS3BPC8 (unknown[223.104.40.124]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr06-12006 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee6695b94d96c8-52ba1; Mon, 05 Jan 2026 18:39:22 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee6695b94d96c8-52ba1
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2026 18:39:22 +0800
From: Jing Wang <wangjingjc@chinamobile.com>
To: detnet <detnet@ietf.org>
References: <b033db74-d12a-4bf8-9f0a-4aca74d14944@labn.net>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.433[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2026010518392167153511@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart778876167261_=----"
Message-ID-Hash: ZMENVGSFJZXTFMGDM64ELVXLNCYAWPWC
X-Message-ID-Hash: ZMENVGSFJZXTFMGDM64ELVXLNCYAWPWC
X-MailFrom: wangjingjc@chinamobile.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-detnet.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Detnet] Re: WG adoption poll: draft-eckert-detnet-tcqf-12
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/7zIzQI_LpgnknPxxE-pNlSM1OBc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:detnet-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:detnet-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:detnet-leave@ietf.org>

Hi all,

I have taken the time to thoroughly read this draft and I support the adoption of the document.

TCQF is an effective mechanism that can achieve low end-to-end jitter in large networks.

Best Regards,
Jing Wang

From: Lou Berger
Date: 2025-12-18 03:26
To: DetNet WG
CC: DetNet Chairs
Subject: [Detnet] WG adoption poll: draft-eckert-detnet-tcqf-12
Hello,

This email begins a 4-week adoption poll for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eckert-detnet-tcqf/12/
NOTE: IPR has been disclosed for this document, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-eckert-detnet-tcqf
Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the list by the end of the day (any time zone) January 14th.
As a reminder this document is part of the larger set of adoption calls of the documents discussed at IETF 124:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-joung-detnet-stateless-fair-queuing/05
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-detnet-deadline-based-forwarding/18
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-detnet-packet-timeslot-mechanism/13
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eckert-detnet-tcqf/09
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eckert-detnet-glbf/06
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryoo-detnet-ontime-forwarding/04
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ryoo-detnet-nscore/02Thank you,
Lou (as Co-chair)

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status