IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Detnet] Comments on draft-bocci-mpls-miad-adi-requirements

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 15 February 2022 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D043A0AE2; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:18:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FREEMAIL_DOC_PDF=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mKCNAcNQc_be; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 371963A0ABC; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id qx21so6944801ejb.13; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:18:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dau+J8l4Y7lbJRTGCFBPnzzftRnybckJX68G2vYazSA=; b=Oo3duFCI/j3BiJLlP3jHMY7rcWfkQOh4vNa1HbAT8rj7YEZtc7HKhiTsNrk7zDDXa6 kNkKJEI1uGlgHGzjVT9QXfjtE8DrolfPU/6M2bjbv0JiKvSW0RCeo3xUYmrOGAaw96qU n9WwdsyZuT5o7f++jTUoEy/DWrjcJvFgL7P6Q4tMqmm80VHNv/OeF8Dp9kXfWDe9TOt7 03HhuoAPnSlGnVlF4xWaejIXC/jmsuolbtiQcaTrPCj54jIdSP4TF1fTWDBf/eKiSif1 8btDo1uj7TsrGeQHu7S6mjPwYYkxmh6QGnIlJMPAQ+3ZXpeK7TXowwaLfo4cQ1O6OPoo KL1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dau+J8l4Y7lbJRTGCFBPnzzftRnybckJX68G2vYazSA=; b=uWcG0PV8br8ey4zJZ6+SpN3Wh69dUJoIWFBOLfkbkqAyAxETKu9ScoXlJVVGGzr+f9 aL8ZyNqsH3LjLuKW/YjQlbWrtbHQw+Ht4W4/z/0B0kn35q3/Hm4XR9/0yA1O2D/BAzKZ PvflsjpReeck+ANhgp50Rk/yD6E99GHgN5CViXEcDfU61NnrK3zeS+HY40aCmc6XNjD1 u8AmyF4r3z0b7WhBy9MbG3kgdWzev+HATeTtnZglRUQHtaurooAGadeTxRLOH09lgdiO 3RAm1zvmmz3LpCuP1QROi3pxukm8DxCaFNtk48nVP5i0btfFq2oCl6ej+JYiKdcGPHJq zsWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Cx293/26naxznYTKu2xeF1UeL7RagdIwhLj2x/zZJ5mcnHbC6 kLbLAVe544O7UNVZZs9ZPmC7U4wWnCfOtwRr+y8beOUk
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlnW/WkrDfitgu2D8OYidV0Iwyhdaa//rk2owiLIT8SsjxU5cDpmZ+6eHbF+GmDPPtKDw3ODHL97hvs9CqDvw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1b0b:: with SMTP id mp11mr651912ejc.382.1644956313162; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:18:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 12:18:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUkdm2dJ5+geme44C6i5bJyqWs_XiA4p_vKjuiniZrPew@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-bocci-mpls-miad-adi-requirements@ietf.org
Cc: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, spring <spring@ietf.org>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000b7c18805d8143cdf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/CKzEy36YpwDRsbRytMUf36tTLyk>
Subject: [Detnet] Comments on draft-bocci-mpls-miad-adi-requirements
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 20:18:44 -0000

Hi Stewart and Matthew,
thank you for organizing this document in a very clear and concise manner.
I enjoyed reading it.
Attached, please find a copy of the draft with my notes, comments, and
suggestions. The most important, in my view, the question I have Should we
add the requirement to have a common format for ancillary data defined?

Looking forward to your feedback.

Regards,
Greg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email