Re: [Detnet] The new d-ACH format
Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 16 November 2021 20:54 UTC
Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8F93A0937; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 12:54:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rvIea9kCTwcj; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 12:54:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EAD63A0910; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 12:54:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id z5so741497edd.3; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 12:54:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=n0UQom4PR/D4Nf9MpXKw2u4tF4B4S+XjkhmCyo3MvHg=; b=m5U8BkaawR8Hv53K8wlU/ahswpnyuVaDcBXMkHKvm6ipQ4ne0CyT/jVbhEm/XC7OzE JdgG74f55z3LZwkBzWVWKWcUh0E6JPvcs5CwEvkUoAo6Txpt84GngqttJ4849lBctpea Ul/PlDcKc3iXMSbtWIHfL2Cxe7rr4/k5OF59018eVWsCZQfyo7yfRRSbWx1Wq2EZYhnF ZCBYTso74GlGxUoGL43aXyO9BZ1odauGq6GZViVPz3DmGZkPWaOiQV8Rg9XR5p14paRF 9AzJKZ5niyRjF8As4xRfbD0OYkLD7Kh7GyU4VtM505NnOvUBZeQ9OoO3feA5nCHkZZxU aOZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=n0UQom4PR/D4Nf9MpXKw2u4tF4B4S+XjkhmCyo3MvHg=; b=4Enp7shyVuG7HEDL7WWAmWMdYTJ2WP3VLNhmt1ZI4qQQ1yA2MZx+hE23lpIha4gp+S JKkFbfiZn0aK2U+xQgfKlZvTV9tN2bT9b6RgLZcD3mX8z+cKzEMYxUAiIEsXvSublScq V+hf4f1atLEEcExcySIRzw8M5ib3NZwTbdAvjQH4RhcucBNnZ0mV8kV+GgjJPxXVTTuO 1zUi7eXhuxf7H1M7LzuxYC0n+a/rwnRCUkbpMdatRUJB7IKd5K1ftnbva950BwOHAc1T fuhqdkVE5nHBj1uhCm8mbSRmvwHMleaB8o4a3cnWbWDktqt61u7M3KuEizcqvniNduMl 4LiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ye8YQHPbGkkLWNzDDFYX0D+mfLxF6cIvHW41EA5TYpzOfscgr lPos4yPNpH2/oh6UKf41gOOumYDORZjj0c7khhqISC4A
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyErBh44hxew9a8rMc7313Pr6uIMhxEQkfoWu/m5IAbzq/jX3UqG5jlw2pLSu/heSQw1hXrcbx7UQW16tbmZs8=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1457:: with SMTP id q23mr13309326ejc.561.1637096088469; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 12:54:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+RyBmWQC9cDZOS7sowcU5ZJsYmJpeUjsaCeCbuxhtD2jS4nGg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmWQC9cDZOS7sowcU5ZJsYmJpeUjsaCeCbuxhtD2jS4nGg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 12:54:37 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXmZriCtWZGRdYFBx7yK_NnSvOmDVbE5wo0FT0FryLcVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Cc: DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d106db05d0ee22e3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/CNNVySsdy3KeHKmDtp5nuR3TBiU>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] The new d-ACH format
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 20:55:00 -0000
Dear All, I hope you've recovered from the IETF-112 (timing on the West Coast was brutal). Please share your thoughts, comments, and questions about the proposed new format of d-ACH and whether you support including it and updating draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-oam. Regards, Greg On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 5:14 AM Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear All, > Bala'zs has presented the new d-ACH (DetNet Associated Channel Header) > format at the DetNet WG meeting. Earlier this week, the new d-ACH format > was presented at joint PALS, MPLS, and DetNet meeting and received several > positive comments. At the DetNet WG meeting, it was proposed to integrate > the technical part, the new format of d-ACH > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-varga-detnet-service-sub-layer-oam-01#page-6> into > the draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-oam > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-oam/>. > Please, respond with the indication of your support or no support for the > proposed update of the WG document. > > Regards, > Greg (as the Editor of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-oam) >
- [Detnet] The new d-ACH format Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Detnet] The new d-ACH format Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Detnet] The new d-ACH format Yangfan(Fan,IP Standards)
- Re: [Detnet] The new d-ACH format Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Detnet] The new d-ACH format Yangfan(Fan,IP Standards)
- Re: [Detnet] The new d-ACH format Greg Mirsky
- Re: [Detnet] The new d-ACH format Gyan Mishra