IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll on draft-mirsky-detnet-ip-oam-03

"Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)" <gengxuesong@huawei.com> Wed, 19 August 2020 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <gengxuesong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA613A08B1 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 05:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HT2GufxdanVv for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 05:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4E53A0891 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 05:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml726-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id D11DFE88898F0E5CCBC2; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:10:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from dggeme702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.98) by lhreml726-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:10:04 +0100
Received: from dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.98) by dggeme702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:10:01 +0800
Received: from dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.76]) by dggeme752-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.76]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:10:01 +0800
From: "Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)" <gengxuesong@huawei.com>
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Detnet] WG adoption poll on draft-mirsky-detnet-ip-oam-03
Thread-Index: AdZyUj+/F7BUlVPXSEC1wqIPjjJD0gDea+Pw//+DNwD//tmdsA==
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 12:10:01 +0000
Message-ID: <ace0f4123efe4844823c213c45d22ba2@huawei.com>
References: <VI1PR0701MB7007A5664B865610B455E1E3F2400@VI1PR0701MB7007.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <52d926ebef9b442eb8fac3a35520e2a0@huawei.com> <CA+RyBmW+FQs073ahBDHn+SnJ7nW081_uazip_bcjT8iXg1Lp8A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmW+FQs073ahBDHn+SnJ7nW081_uazip_bcjT8iXg1Lp8A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.242.209]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ace0f4123efe4844823c213c45d22ba2huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/GGC6M7-VYIcPiSQkJ3-J94viZzE>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll on draft-mirsky-detnet-ip-oam-03
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 12:10:08 -0000

Sure Greg. Thanks for your advice!
Let’s have more discussions about this together, especially about what should be included in draft-malis-detnet-controller-plane-framework about OAM.

Best Regards
Xuesong

From: Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 10:30 AM
To: Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) <gengxuesong@huawei.com>
Cc: Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll on draft-mirsky-detnet-ip-oam-03

Hi Geng Xuesong,
thank you for your kind consideration of the draft and thoughtful suggestion. I agree that the explanation of relationships among three drafts will help readers. Will discuss that with authors of the draft-malis-detnet-controller-plane-framework and draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-oam.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 7:01 PM Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong) <gengxuesong@huawei.com<mailto:gengxuesong@huawei.com>> wrote:
Yes, support!
One more comment: In the next version, I think some explanations about the relationship between OAM drafts (including draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-oam-01) and DetNet controller plane framework draft should be considered.

Best Regards
Xuesong

From: detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Janos Farkas
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2020 11:50 PM
To: DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org<mailto:detnet@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Detnet] WG adoption poll on draft-mirsky-detnet-ip-oam-03

Hi,

This is start of a three week poll on making
draft-mirsky-detnet-ip-oam-03 a working group document. Please
send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends September 4.

Regards,
Janos and Lou
_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
detnet@ietf.org<mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email