Re: [Detnet] WG adoption poll draft-finn-detnet-architecture

Lou,

I've just completed reading the document and I find it very useful. I 
support the adoption as a working group document.

Three small questions (no need to try to fix before the adoption of the
document):

- I think we need the the concept of "DetNet Path", if we agree on this
   it should go into the terminology section.

- The top of the document says "DetNet", should this be "DetNet Working
   Group" or even "DETNET Working Group", after all it is intended to
   indicate where the  document originated.

- do we have a way of visually distinguish between the working group
   and the technology, e.g. "DETNET" or "detnet" for the wg and "DetNet"
   for the technology?

/Loa

On 2016-09-02 13:58, Lou Berger wrote:
> All,
>
> This is start of a two week poll on making
> draft-finn-detnet-architecture-08 a working group document. Please
> send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> support".  If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
> document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
> like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
>
> The poll ends September 23.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lou and Pat
>
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64