Re: [Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-12: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 06 May 2019 15:51 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BC91201DE; Mon, 6 May 2019 08:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f93txz8hzB-r; Mon, 6 May 2019 08:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42F19120228; Mon, 6 May 2019 08:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [129.192.10.3] (helo=[10.149.1.237]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1hNfto-0001Zp-Kz; Mon, 06 May 2019 17:51:28 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <e0082506-5aa9-992e-a620-a05f50c284bd@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 17:51:27 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-detnet-architecture@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-detnet-architecture@ietf.org>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, "detnet-chairs@ietf.org" <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6D73185F-25C8-4E40-9CBC-502EF86A59DF@kuehlewind.net>
References: <155532936068.10827.6039363810956335567.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB4PR07MB33139ED91E5E4956DDFD066F2390@DB4PR07MB331.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <e0082506-5aa9-992e-a620-a05f50c284bd@ericsson.com>
To: János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1557157893;c711865e;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1hNfto-0001Zp-Kz
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/Kv4CRK7tXGr0hjKdm-hvdxADEh8>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 15:51:44 -0000
Great. Thanks! > On 6. May 2019, at 16:19, János Farkas <janos.farkas@ericsson.com> wrote: > > Hi Mirja, > > Revision 13 of the draft includes additional reference in Section 3.3.2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-13#section-3.3.2, https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-13. > > Thank you, > Janos > > > On 4/29/2019 2:28 PM, Janos Farkas wrote: >> Hi Mirja, >> >> Thank you! >> >> Based on our discussion it seems to be better to refer to AQM [RFC 7567] at the end of Section 3.3.2, e.g.,: >> >> >> "Examples of such techniques include traffic policing and >> shaping functions (e.g., [RFC2475]), separating flows into per- >> flow rate-limited queues, and potentially apply active queue management [RFC 7567].” >> >> Regards, >> Janos >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> >> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 1:56 PM >> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> >> Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-architecture@ietf.org; Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>; detnet-chairs@ietf.org; lberger@labn.net; detnet@ietf.org >> Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-12: (with COMMENT) >> >> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-12: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-architecture/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Thanks for addressing my discuss. One more minor comment: I see the reference to bufferbloat in section 3.2.1.1, however, I guess the reference would actually be even more need in section 3.3.2. >> >> I agree with Alexey and Benjamin that this document should be informational. >> Informational documents can also have IETF consensus, so that cannot be the reason to go for PS. However, this document does not specify a protocol or any requirements that are mandatory to implement for interoperability and therefore should not be PS. >> >> > >
- [Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
- Re: [Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Janos Farkas
- Re: [Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… János Farkas
- Re: [Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Mirja Kuehlewind