[Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-12: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 15 April 2019 11:56 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietf.org
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE7C120096; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 04:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-detnet-architecture@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, detnet@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.95.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <155532936068.10827.6039363810956335567.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 04:56:00 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/zxo7iRYbjlj5_baFYz_rs44fHkE>
Subject: [Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:56:01 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-detnet-architecture-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-architecture/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for addressing my discuss. One more minor comment: I see the reference to bufferbloat in section 3.2.1.1, however, I guess the reference would actually be even more need in section 3.3.2. I agree with Alexey and Benjamin that this document should be informational. Informational documents can also have IETF consensus, so that cannot be the reason to go for PS. However, this document does not specify a protocol or any requirements that are mandatory to implement for interoperability and therefore should not be PS.
- [Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
- Re: [Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Janos Farkas
- Re: [Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… János Farkas
- Re: [Detnet] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Mirja Kuehlewind