IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] Looking for partners for Gap Analysis draft

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Tue, 31 March 2015 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77DEA1A1AB2 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_DIV_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8s8LF0Euf5zp for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com (mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com [216.31.210.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431371A3B9C for <detnet@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.11,502,1422950400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="60854277"
Received: from irvexchcas06.broadcom.com (HELO IRVEXCHCAS06.corp.ad.broadcom.com) ([10.9.208.53]) by mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com with ESMTP; 31 Mar 2015 10:41:51 -0700
Received: from SJEXCHCAS03.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.203.8) by IRVEXCHCAS06.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.9.208.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.174.1; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:38:01 -0700
Received: from SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([fe80::3da7:665e:cc78:181f]) by SJEXCHCAS03.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:38:01 -0700
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
To: "Prof. Diego Dujovne" <diego.dujovne@mail.udp.cl>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Detnet] Looking for partners for Gap Analysis draft
Thread-Index: AQHQZxNH8j8mrDx2yky+kcj22Fp+H5023ltg
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:38:00 +0000
Message-ID: <72CC502C2C615C42B081A9E5FC057D05255DB0@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
References: <CAH7SZV8zmOHZRf=wsHSk_qHfCZqheKfbeMHTAttzu+o4c_FU7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH7SZV8zmOHZRf=wsHSk_qHfCZqheKfbeMHTAttzu+o4c_FU7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.16.203.100]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_72CC502C2C615C42B081A9E5FC057D05255DB0SJEXCHMB09corpadb_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/OWF3WA5JhxOaZj9Fqr9ZHaxCYWM>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Looking for partners for Gap Analysis draft
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions on Deterministic Networking, characterized by 1\) resource reservation; 2\) 0 congestion loss and guaranteed latency; 3\) over L2-only and mixed L2 and L3 networks; and 5\) 1+1 replication/deletion." <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 17:38:09 -0000

Hi,

I was reading the draft.. Thanks for initiating the work! Few quick questions and comments.

In Section 3.2 or as a separate section shouldn’t we also point at IEEE 802.1CB as a L2 mechanism to provide redundancy. Also, instead of referring to MPLS I would rather talk PWEs instead.

Then another comment specifically regarding Section 3 gap analysis. As it stands now it is more like a rundown of solutions. I do not see a gap to anything discussed/pointed here? Each of these sections should list what is missing or what cannot be supported if transport goes over IP.

What I would do is to first list down the issues / building blocks that we know are must to have to realize a deterministic networking at L3. After that each technology have a short description, followed by (bullet) list what can be supported and what not. And then a short summary for each technology. Comments?

- Jouni

From: detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Prof. Diego Dujovne
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 8:49 AM
To: detnet@ietf.org
Subject: [Detnet] Looking for partners for Gap Analysis draft

Dear all,
            I have published the first (-00) version of the
Gap Analysis draft:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dujovne-detnet-gap-analysis-00

 I'm looking for co-authors to collaborate
to build this draft. Let me know through the list
if you are interested.
Thank you.
                            Diego Dujovne

--
DIEGO DUJOVNE
Académico Escuela de Ingeniería en Informática y Telecomunicaciones
Facultad de Ingeniería UDP
www.ingenieria.udp.cl<http://www.ingenieria.udp.cl>
(56 2) 676 8125

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email