Re: [Detnet] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-05

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 12 March 2020 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7A93A09BB for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 04:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.362
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.362 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.463, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2wkeESXsGzFV for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 04:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy7-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [70.40.196.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 406133A0B1C for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 04:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CMGW (unknown [10.9.0.13]) by gproxy7.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D59215DED for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:07:58 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id CLh0j1m54KO5VCLh0jDvyB; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:07:58 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=X4QiECbe c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=SS2py6AdgQ4A:10 a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=8Thv01DKMWluz4qxGx8A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=rKrVYePj7rwA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GUx3nu854t6PGLD2PVg9uJGj3vmFZVYAxU+wNOoRg90=; b=AYlERUhXb8Ix6fbsJiftRwzxdA OUePJhGTAOKJg1iNbxZBAmEIpgtIDRmMC2OdvRVXnOI74cOEc0E2/OFAb/2vXFdlu1MUbc1DRhNJi xgX7HYemqxkZU9Yk2A6oJPieH;
Received: from pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([72.66.11.201]:41370 helo=[11.5.0.140]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1jCLh0-002UM0-3e; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 05:07:58 -0600
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
CC: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls.all@ietf.org, DetNet WG <detnet@ietf.org>, secdir <secdir@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:07:55 -0400
Message-ID: <170ce6deaf8.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0cmQ0pzGF9MxVWGx-gMUOR6eR7zkKhnMPDx-876xt-H3sw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <158389693039.16158.6977515080330200081@ietfa.amsl.com> <E15E2A3F-5EAA-4B86-B39A-14521AD762D5@gmail.com> <CACsn0cnxjPf3ziSQbjdLmD+1xUJtcDF3kSbz0LiSj=b_safb2A@mail.gmail.com> <137FCA36-3B7C-46EB-B951-3FDC01560069@gmail.com> <CACsn0cmQ0pzGF9MxVWGx-gMUOR6eR7zkKhnMPDx-876xt-H3sw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.22.0-1511 (build: 102200004)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 72.66.11.201
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1jCLh0-002UM0-3e
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([11.5.0.140]) [72.66.11.201]:41370
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 2
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/SYt8dAoNBIETH3u3c-eY-eB-5dc>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-05
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:08:07 -0000

Watson,

Can you provide context here? Can you be explicit on what you see needs to 
be addressed (beyond what is in this document as well as related rfcs)?

Thank you,
Lou


----------
On March 11, 2020 10:30:27 PM Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't see any reason why RFC 3552's guidelines shoudn't apply to this draft.
>
> If there is a MPLS exception I'd like to see the rules that should be applied.
>
> As is I don't see any reason why the assumptions can't be explicitly
> spelled out, either in the Security Considerations or elsewhere.
>
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>