Re: [Detnet] DetNet Design Team Interim Meeting Notes - MPLS - 29May18
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 30 May 2018 19:02 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BF912EB1F for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2018 12:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dgeXbIkfn2bf for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2018 12:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.20.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B12212DA22 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2018 12:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw13.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.13]) by gproxy10.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731281409DF for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2018 12:31:47 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id O5safFy7yLr3zO5safMKtF; Wed, 30 May 2018 12:31:24 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fsVAuBYfLQfnwaWGTOU2EOA2Oapg0aayCLlBH2mFk6E=; b=1ugBRjnekPFEhSEOVz9V9XP70Y XOdXiZXeiWyOQGds5M5k6WPC9M5LUdvwUzabpPaK2HLjqGCU7y8Ck6jMsHw2/qM1HJbqTRZqmiCFz AQEu38+4DnPMiTBiW2WbhqedZ;
Received: from pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.15.86.101]:60300 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1fO5sw-0043DC-Vx for detnet@ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 12:31:47 -0600
To: "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>
References: <3A3B0EA9-CCDC-4347-A670-7F94B67265CA@dolby.net>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <d71c0903-1d5c-39e1-461f-3b3672dddf77@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 14:31:46 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3A3B0EA9-CCDC-4347-A670-7F94B67265CA@dolby.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.15.86.101
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1fO5sw-0043DC-Vx
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-15-86-101.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([IPv6:::1]) [100.15.86.101]:60300
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 7
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/TRN08_f3Q7XygIUjkgP_Cs7zyB8>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] DetNet Design Team Interim Meeting Notes - MPLS - 29May18
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 19:02:50 -0000
Note this was a "working meeting" not a formal WG interim meeting. Lou On 5/29/2018 12:09 PM, Grossman, Ethan A. wrote: > > Hi All > > Here are my meeting notes, please correct anything I missed. > > Thanks, > > Ethan. > > ------------------- > > Date: Tues May 29, 2018 > > Present on Webex: Stewart, Loa, Janos, Balazs, Vishnu, Jouni, Lou, Ethan. > > Summary of conclusions: > > Stewart had concerns between terminology alignment between this doc > and architecture doc, but nothing else that impacted this doc - but > note here with the intent that eventually we will align them through > usual review process for consistency of terminology. > > Regarding section on time sync: Prefer to strip text to some other new > document, but won’t add reference to new doc since out of scope. > > Maybe brief mention of two models, but details for time sync out of > scope. > > Strip local label stuff, have it point to S label where appropriate. > > 16 or 28 bit sequence numbers only. Value of S label establishes size > of sequence number, established by control plane. > > Must look at NSP text. Processing of PREF stuff is allowed in NSP. > > UDP header in Fig 14: Don’t say anything about ECMP at this point. > UDP not mandatory in this stack. > > References to class of service, quality of service – decided to keep > it as is for now for education purposes but may be changed or removed > eventually. > > Sec 10. Management and control considerations – needs to be separate > for MPLS vs IP? > > 10.1.2 Explicit routes – currently empty – need a plan. > > Stewart: need to list methods: > > RSVP-TE, Segment Routing (whatever flavor) or set up in control plane. > Maybe other ways developed in time. > > For now just placeholder text. Just these two references should be > enough. > > Goal to get these changes out by end of next week. Stewart to do this > work – then Jouni and Balazs will finalize edits. > > Next interim MPLS meeting will be June 5, 8am PDT, 5pm Central > European time. > > Stewart won’t have done edits by then – then meet June 25 MPLS same > time since will have done edits by then and will have feedback to > discuss. > > Jouni offline for July. Won’t be at IETF. > > ------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > detnet mailing list > detnet@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
- [Detnet] DetNet Design Team Interim Meeting Notes… Grossman, Ethan A.
- Re: [Detnet] DetNet Design Team Interim Meeting N… Lou Berger