Re: [Detnet] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-korhonen-detnet-telreq-00.txt

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Thu, 04 June 2015 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7E31B3153 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2oYjfhL1QmVj for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw3-out.broadcom.com (mail-gw3-out.broadcom.com [216.31.210.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973F91B3151 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,549,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="66383863"
Received: from irvexchcas08.broadcom.com (HELO IRVEXCHCAS08.corp.ad.broadcom.com) ([10.9.208.57]) by mail-gw3-out.broadcom.com with ESMTP; 03 Jun 2015 18:51:51 -0700
Received: from SJEXCHCAS06.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.16.203.14) by IRVEXCHCAS08.corp.ad.broadcom.com (10.9.208.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:40:25 -0700
Received: from SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([fe80::3da7:665e:cc78:181f]) by SJEXCHCAS06.corp.ad.broadcom.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:40:24 -0700
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-korhonen-detnet-telreq-00.txt
Thread-Index: AdCeZ2u63ndcVrzWQ4qAn5MEp/nYWg==
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 01:40:24 +0000
Message-ID: <72CC502C2C615C42B081A9E5FC057D052CB382@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.16.203.100]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/jcNYy8N8YgHpI_ZDqgajohMIOvY>
Cc: "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-korhonen-detnet-telreq-00.txt
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions on Deterministic Networking, characterized by 1\) resource reservation; 2\) 0 congestion loss and guaranteed latency; 3\) over L2-only and mixed L2 and L3 networks; and 5\) 1+1 replication/deletion." <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 01:40:27 -0000

Pascal,

Thank you for reading the document. See my comments inline.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pascal Thubert
> (pthubert)
> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 9:18 AM
> To: Jouni Korhonen
> Cc: detnet@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Detnet] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-korhonen-detnet-telreq-00.txt
> 
> Hello Jouni:
> 
> Thanks a bunch for posting this!
> 
> I read the need of time sync is pervasive.  But do you have cases where
> replication and elimination would be of use?

The issue with replication really is the traffic volume - you do not want to double your pain you are already having today. If future developments on the radio bring the traffic volumes to sane numbers replication could be useful, since there is no really room for retransmissions or forward error coding schemes that require interleaving.

> I see a requirement of 10^-9 but then that one is over one hop?

That is over one hop.

> Typo left P4:  architecural

ACK. Will fix.

- Jouni

> 
> All the best,
> 
> Pascal
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
> > Sent: jeudi 28 mai 2015 21:30
> > To: detnet@ietf.org
> > Subject: [Detnet] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-korhonen-detnet-telreq-00.txt
> >
> > FYI.. a slightly different view to DetNet.
> >
> >         Title           : Deterministic networking for radio access networks
> >         Author          : Jouni Korhonen
> >         Filename        : draft-korhonen-detnet-telreq-00.txt
> >         Pages           : 11
> >         Date            : 2015-05-28
> >
> > Abstract:
> >    This document describes requirements for deterministic networking in
> >    cellular radio access and transport networks context.  The
> >    requirements include time synchronization, clock distribution and
> >    ways of establishing time-sensitive streams for both Layer-2 and
> >    Layer-3 user plane traffic using IETF protocol solutions.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-korhonen-detnet-telreq/
> >
> > There's also a htmlized version available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-korhonen-detnet-telreq-00
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > detnet mailing list
> > detnet@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet