Re: [Detnet] DetNet interim possibilities

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 14 February 2018 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FEF12D77E for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:43:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hYZ16oU6xtGv for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:43:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6AD5126D85 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:43:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:77]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0812758C5DD; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 18:43:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id DEEB9B0DA66; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 18:43:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 18:43:04 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Norman Finn <norman.finn@mail01.huawei.com>
Cc: "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20180214174304.GU19760@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8D03175@DFWPML704-CHM.exmail.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3DF0466E9510274382F5B74499ACD6F8D03175@DFWPML704-CHM.exmail.huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/l8V65QWOr4RIHIei-WAyu3Q0o5E>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] DetNet interim possibilities
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 17:43:11 -0000

Would be good to collect names of WG participants interested to
go to the interim and have them express their preferences and constraints
wrt. time and location. That way its a lot easier to figure out what
would be a good location and time. I remember when we had IETF in
Orlando folks stayed over to IEEE, but then again, it was Orlando.
Not sure how attractive it is even for IEEE participants to extend an
already gruelsome IEEE week with a detnet meeting In Pittsburgh.

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:28:02PM +0000, Norman Finn wrote:
> The IEEE 802.1 and 802.3 people be meeting in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania the week of May 21, 2018 for a full 5-day meeting.  This may provide a starting point for arranging a DetNet interim.
> 
> http://1.ieee802.org/meetings/
> 
> -- Norm

> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet