[Detnet] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof-11: (with COMMENT)

[Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-over-ip-preof/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks to Olivier Bonaventure for the
TSVART review.

This document is reusing RFC9025 which confirms with the BCP145, hence no
objection from using UDP as encapsulation layer.

However, I am not sure why this is an informational document. what was the
reasoning behind it?