Re: [Detnet] New version of draft-aft-detnet-bound-delay-queue

peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn Fri, 19 April 2024 09:22 UTC

Return-Path: <peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EE8C14F615 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.891
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.891 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hFnZmltj8e3Q for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:22:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA95AC14F5F4 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl2.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4VLTgm3rbpz8XrS2; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:22:28 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app07.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.95]) by mse-fl2.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 43J9MCt5072902; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:22:13 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njb2app07[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:22:15 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:22:15 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2aff662237c72fa-67d97
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20240419172215411HmPpjUDqs-GofJZ-dVh6M@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <d29268ee289f4ae1b1a400eee889db33@huawei.com>
References: d29268ee289f4ae1b1a400eee889db33@huawei.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn
To: antoine.fressancourt=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Cc: detnet@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl2.zte.com.cn 43J9MCt5072902
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 662237D4.000/4VLTgm3rbpz8XrS2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/tIFroxmSnF2l2Pe-EjsjJ9KpHcY>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] New version of draft-aft-detnet-bound-delay-queue
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 09:22:38 -0000

Hi Antoine,

I have a quesiton after relearned this document, can you clarify how to set the Cp of each queue ?
I guess there is a relationship between Cp and the queue's buffer size, but not sure what is the formula. 
It seems that Cp is not the queue's service rate (CIR).

Regards,
PSF



Original


From: AntoineFRESSANCOURT <antoine.fressancourt=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: detnet@ietf.org <detnet@ietf.org>;
Date: 2024年04月18日 23:04
Subject: [Detnet] New version of draft-aft-detnet-bound-delay-queue

_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
detnet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet

 

Hello,
 
Following some remarks during IETF 119 meeting, please find a new version of draft-aft-detnet-bound-delay-queue for which I am a co-author.
 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-aft-detnet-bound-delay-queue/
 
As a notable addition to this version of the draft, you will find a new section (6) entitled “Positioning in the Dataplane Enhancement Taxonomy” that summarizes how the mechanisms presented in the draft fit in the taxonomy that is currently being worked on in the Detnet WG.
 
Best regards,
 
Antoine Fressancourt