[Detnet] Available ISP topologies in academic work

Antoine FRESSANCOURT <antoine.fressancourt@huawei.com> Thu, 21 March 2024 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <antoine.fressancourt@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D18C15154A for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URI_DOTEDU=1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3mIENxdmsik0 for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79ABBC180B4C for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V0q3K31Yyz6K9BX for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 23:23:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B74E0140C72 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 23:27:28 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:27:28 +0000
Received: from lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com ([7.191.162.67]) by lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com ([7.191.162.67]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:27:28 +0000
From: Antoine FRESSANCOURT <antoine.fressancourt@huawei.com>
To: "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Available ISP topologies in academic work
Thread-Index: Adp7oyC+EAAQ7zCeS1+2KYCkJXPKbQ==
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:27:28 +0000
Message-ID: <56baecbe18954627806ed624c4ef5701@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.206.215.65]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_56baecbe18954627806ed624c4ef5701huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/u4D6NkNG_DZSBNYVkg_ZTaGxIEI>
Subject: [Detnet] Available ISP topologies in academic work
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:27:35 -0000

Hello,

Bouncing on the call for topologies to evaluate large scale DetNet proposals, I reminded some topologies I have been using during my PhD time, a few years ago. Unfortunately, some Internet tomography projects have stopped since then, and given the growing criticality of the Internet infrastructure, it seems that publicly available ISP-level topologies are difficult to get.

The reference project people go to when looking for ISP-level topologies is Rocketfuel (https://research.cs.washington.edu/networking/rocketfuel/). It is old but topologies extracted from this dataset are still used for routing mechanism evaluation.

Some specific ISP topologies have been refined and complemented with demands from flows in DEFO (https://sites.uclouvain.be/defo/). DEFO uses both real topologies from Rocketfuel and synthetic topologies generated with iGen (https://informatique.umons.ac.be/networks/igen/). The missing aspect in DEFO's augmented topologies is the lack of latency bounds or Jitter bounds for flows, inter-arrival times etc. . Maybe we can augment those topologies to fit with what we need as a group to evaluate large scale detnet options ?

Best regards,

Antoine Fressancourt