Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-tpmb-detnet-oam-framework-00

Georgios PAPADOPOULOS <> Fri, 09 April 2021 07:39 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59F0E3A1408; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.828
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.828 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FAKE_REPLY_B=1.269, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aWhMKD_ySDPO; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91E8A3A1407; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id j20-20020a05600c1914b029010f31e15a7fso4164967wmq.1; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=YO3dm/dwi9HZit8Zt8fWJ8b4FHyPWZtP86jUAixrjSk=; b=j6pOeLzljSIrPUhOUD4GQZ41djgn1sw8CdsMjSOYQqGj4oMY0TGsWSjx5qcZcpwBWm YpC8iieKbW0ULOtR9XNYNtbHR/3PCz9bPtitdGngHrGp9airgEXRqCJJbL4H4Fe+rzoi lSCGGzzQIP77NH8IfArSb2qTqFpCtl2jji7RdIfeD/uJ8Ob8s3G01zcfh9gzAIZNbCwo PZYh3SjPc6FKfjYpTkAm0O+zYxrrGJI6cTqXZREooNhBvgzX0TUwTrcKiLrm2jKDr0UM 064xhsQzYgBBRUjXI99ceAWKJnSNd8quEQtpE2Em4su18jGHQnPbsawJbGUI10q1HcpE x5Sg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:cc:to; bh=YO3dm/dwi9HZit8Zt8fWJ8b4FHyPWZtP86jUAixrjSk=; b=VNUohA9VmUQtTdVbX/jtYzMMo6PE+ZXNklM86TWPl6hP0Tgj+J7QfY7tINQxjq1hPP T1HrXk03/DKCwBPMJV0dQaHs53PKh5a6zRR61ASlQ3LiCjoJ30Qw3sZ9J2EjZVLE/3h6 Vie4V5TGexe6iDL5Juhz5J9fE7jMGbrfEAkYe6Xo92/KJCYXan0d/NOPTWGjYg2OOvaf CtDbJKLdk7JFVs5dp5palvxngX3mQnfQpYzXf+7oGHud6A5jHWaFHYQPNo9UifxJfd2O 5g7ljO8BV4+0RnCLjb7deFYHk8Vc1iYUA7O/+aX+vsXKN04Q9xuRbPx95o0nduDDP1jW SNTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336aEFxx+PYZjvTLTHvDIFyaVV+azeH///kye+Vidwc41cuHvSb dyQ5vItTuil8E3ouN+bSHmHP2zfI5IQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4PUCPvfFUlKVIPRo3DUytdRoW+5NJQ1MIo6DnjNBJG1E/HR7iehtyIXhtG1IQbTf1viCxvg==
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb05:: with SMTP id u5mr12418718wmj.183.1617953956336; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e0a:170:d730:75ee:65c9:e873:7ff2? ([2a01:e0a:170:d730:75ee:65c9:e873:7ff2]) by with ESMTPSA id b15sm2980813wrx.73.2021. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Georgios PAPADOPOULOS <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FFB5F6B4-C3E3-463B-A35A-40AD3DF3E4C4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.\))
Message-Id: <>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 09:39:12 +0200
Cc:,, DetNet Chairs <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-tpmb-detnet-oam-framework-00
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 07:39:24 -0000

Dear all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.


From: detnet < <>> On Behalf Of Janos Farkas
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 12:54 PM
To: DetNet WG < <>>
Subject: [Detnet] Regarding IPR on draft-tpmb-detnet-oam-framework-00

Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
    Please state either:
    "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
    "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
If yes to the above, please state either:
    "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
    "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and <>.
Thank you,
János (and Lou)