[Detnet] draft-ietf-raw-architecture-25 telechat Iotdir review

Dave Thaler via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 03 July 2025 01:12 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dave Thaler via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: iot-directorate@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <175150515439.865645.3026818176333441160@dt-datatracker-6fcb845cd4-p6tkq>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 18:12:34 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: UMQBMKRZBHD4I2QJ4JFKLJKKFUDTZOXW
CC: detnet@ietf.org, draft-ietf-raw-architecture.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Reply-To: Dave Thaler <dave.thaler.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: [Detnet] draft-ietf-raw-architecture-25 telechat Iotdir review
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/xEe5eBAcqD1ZIx9A42ml6TzdPvs>

Document: draft-ietf-raw-architecture
Title: Reliable and Available Wireless Architecture
Reviewer: Dave Thaler
Review result: Ready with Nits

I am the assigned IOTDIR reviewer for this document.

I found the document to be easily readable and well-written, modulo a
bunch of typos and grammatical nits.  A marked up copy with all
of my comments/suggestions to fix editorial nits is at:

https://1drv.ms/b/c/dc2b364f3f06fea8/EX2CTd0YGM9FkbK2YqL-oyAB56Tn91O4M2eqkq_63OsqNA?e=pmZlen

I only had 1 technical comment on the document, which is in the
security considerations section.  Section 6.2 (Forced Access) only
discusses financial cost as a metric that can be attacked.  However,
I believe that forced access can similarly be used to attack other
metrics such as battery life of IOT nodes, or causing congestion on the
forced path, thus reducing throughput, etc.  I believe these should
be similarly called out in that section before publication.

Dave

[Detnet] draft-ietf-raw-architecture-25 telechat … Dave Thaler via Datatracker
[Detnet] Re: draft-ietf-raw-architecture-25 telec… Pascal Thubert
[Detnet] Re: draft-ietf-raw-architecture-25 telec… Dave Thaler