IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-ip-oam-12: (with COMMENT)

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 13 February 2024 00:30 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A627C14F600; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:30:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r1kayjrw-oBD; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com (mail-yb1-xb31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 644ECC1516E0; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-db3a09e96daso3216620276.3; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:30:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1707784231; x=1708389031; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xWNXvQNdhZEgN/PZyiEudLasakkH2aRjT9I7bQHOmkM=; b=DqTI0F/+J1/6BLaq5+aDFGMkI7wgDdydDKqamVLJa13UmrLVo06BhEN4LcjHYfAcQR RjA6BztYQYryEA/5dKYzF+bc8n+PIYQhfudv3KkzIRLwggST2ioMbcs0jFFx6/GYGpWG 5F4dYQWfVFvV47o8HKVjb0PaOYXSxKe+s/M/j2W9y0vsGjpXregZ7oWwp+afbd+EAnMf MyAQWrpmz68FMLlAfBrzJ7XmKN031GUcmQ7Dj6h0M562Ks0PT1HXiUYeWRNlUnCEXt11 ZguvNkclsjSSubifFfGklFSkDHYCtDd5KJI6ZQD0apRveuPQ7dDmqkiJBmTPyMDGSEpr LF1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707784231; x=1708389031; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=xWNXvQNdhZEgN/PZyiEudLasakkH2aRjT9I7bQHOmkM=; b=Ei4Tj6G3dJvyzoigK2uf4TxHOM/Y/kYXTIOUEM7T2cIGMx85nqx2EBt2sm4WaLiE10 frkPt7wWzy9yGDdNK54Ea1hfWuV6WU95n7fbXmpaiHytZi39Kp9wYPjUUL84DQfVGdEg sXMPu2SiQXrUy6cTXledBWCM8QIaq/d4FBhjSz8tS34YgTL30tilSeNvxP8IVUKmVZ+b oGNwFoZknnFiNSTN0JA0c0gKOXCZ8I/LrE8VF+D7TKNyWzrIFhr+gEu6yhYOGsWBXhVn J91X0UJEGddyDWtVjkaEeUzw5eQR4JBF2gnHmH5u2bZJmbm+0q9l9w9Djn4WwUwpbRiT 9OQw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWNiDVJc7+PzWDFb6Pk/KS7H7dI91gUSOEAfAA9zP2twtczHIKn5M8hDMKPQQ2mpdyLtSlr5f5lZrA+8vlweMJImz1d8ilg9UASEYlVx7+rjCFENoQNCPeU7VD3ta+G/SP0fBAiACYbdPG4Fc34oZE6cCyF98BCnyjjeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy6O1BrWF4XKjKW8IxILNJ/VC26sQFxfcGYg2uDkd/Lk3uJ7Cth S2QnKnuWHeBMJyU5kgAypeHTOzruc63O75NL8mbc0O/54Or5EZKVmcot8FQ2KbtD02HH7hZ0axZ bfc/575b1XQoFFmGQVJXEEu/iFh313lju
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFn9Ru5MV448ikZzk7fbB+bjBDz3UXMONeXPXQRDOei/m+RQOMW7JmYX5wp3QNtszBB9FzMzAddvc2cqniCVyE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:1b0f:b0:dc6:4b5a:410a with SMTP id eh15-20020a0569021b0f00b00dc64b5a410amr7768993ybb.12.1707784231223; Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:30:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <170777843978.35264.12220691594369863825@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <170777843978.35264.12220691594369863825@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:30:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmX2D_-6puSsT4ydu3sY33o_m7CtDH=AA1fT9pnhP-Zrmw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-detnet-ip-oam@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org, detnet@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, janos.farkas@ericsson.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000074848206113880ef"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/xOOyKC9IGleifbCRuD_mTImBGbk>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-ip-oam-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 00:30:36 -0000

Hi Martin,
thank you for being so supportive of this work. I want to
acknowledge Bernard's help in improving the document.

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 2:54 PM Martin Duke via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-detnet-ip-oam-12: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-ip-oam/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks to Bernard Adoba for the TSVART review.
>
> This document seems to be a very long version of the sentence "make sure
> your
> OAM flows hash the same as your data flows", but I see no transport issues.
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email