IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dhcpv6bis] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-08

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Wed, 14 June 2017 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcpv6bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcpv6bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F0912947A for <dhcpv6bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eivYLZ5DbjCJ for <dhcpv6bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B011129527 for <dhcpv6bis@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v20so7079493lfa.1 for <dhcpv6bis@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3Ed28+eNjlDlfHj/M0gjvHJ4as+f7DCVgc8dHs2Ftbg=; b=OL7hoGo0UVd1SCPc94aseQD1wks0XSGC/C9AG/NDyk0Lg1XpGjWZ2ttHKj58UeWc1c /rJn1iCB76BqIwpCmBFp8MO/79boXWSkgQwos5xAm7+id6eXmRteNc/fjdUJQZQFksl+ 7sonPFKj46iNavZuQP25OUsnhGU3xV64H6cwZlTaxf5t0nVvigjW59LpTVeTjF6WNIfv jjtDeAGGk5UGJaU/V+vGKxyfly11OCjUwHXzgAowxHbboPGSL7cR58Uge0KO2eEGfICp U7PqX1ia6ahY27O4QhcaAr3Tx6bo6rWCH43iHqRaYE5JAZbpsE63HRjGoJN1TZ6EvNIf 2tQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3Ed28+eNjlDlfHj/M0gjvHJ4as+f7DCVgc8dHs2Ftbg=; b=ng4pcTZfKSnYceAVXXqoIUmm5/Yfs9Fr8kLgbBfDuyqCyhDBUWFNVObFEGNE/gNRqM djh7hX/alcdfYGotW0IJ/lxW2VnRSf+8tFk8CK8VnPj8aXhmcqQ4Q7L6zaycCMfQHNtL sEgyp5M8RT6xQla345Tse8qWLZJxEmLd+fYc1UD1zk7JbGTdcL7RXlOLSFtQuGu3l2x5 QP9Hl4UyWlckqIzF8nC9CAR1jhgB14Aa2gs0DbKjFA4K0wEV3aLIhK4UxVF04eaY0VYP J36+j4sa52r7fQdQiygdkhzWN0W3KTkrmSGHkiscdWS5PTdnyJMtJQTNmCgvlKpkvt6w YWrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOw0VDCe0Xi5KM2AJvo7wsZtJC+3uEnite2LPC2FFaLAcGQS0M9x FEJ+iSRy1ZjnMcy9
X-Received: by 10.25.87.79 with SMTP id l76mr496880lfb.90.1497464969180; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.7] (109241207033.gdansk.vectranet.pl. [109.241.207.33]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 25sm173081ljo.24.2017.06.14.11.29.27 for <dhcpv6bis@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
To: dhcpv6bis@ietf.org
References: <75248e9a027343bc90e7e20c1de291e7@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <CAOSSMjUBNC0k3e--7PHaB6XcsSV_=dcKO93A1i8DLJ_czzkydw@mail.gmail.com> <0BA5390A-AB5E-4779-A2F7-ABEAFD55E54E@cisco.com>
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e53ce5f5-0454-9637-9eee-495bfc37fa54@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:29:26 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0BA5390A-AB5E-4779-A2F7-ABEAFD55E54E@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcpv6bis/Mmsg26miYj4rpN8tX8Es8DbcmH4>
Subject: Re: [Dhcpv6bis] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-08
X-BeenThere: dhcpv6bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "DHCPv6 \(RFC3315\) bis discussion list" <dhcpv6bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcpv6bis>, <mailto:dhcpv6bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcpv6bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcpv6bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcpv6bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcpv6bis>, <mailto:dhcpv6bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:29:33 -0000

W dniu 14.06.2017 o 15:08, Bernie Volz (volz) pisze:

We ran out of time for the last few (row 25 and up), but Tomek will take a look at this and update the sheet with comments.

I just did that. Here are my comments for specific lines:
#25: I agree with Bernie's suggestion. The text has been updated. Please review.
#26: Jinmei said he's not sure whether the problem is there, doesn't have time so he gave up. No other reviewers raised this concern, so there's nothing to do there in my opinion.
#27: not sure what to do here. Perhaps we can wait a bit for Jinmei to contribute a text, but don't treat it as a blocking issue for -09 submission?
#28: the current text is pretty clear to me. No action needed here in my opinion.

Tomek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email