[Dhcpv6bis] 2014-01-22 meeting minutes
Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Wed, 22 January 2014 15:53 UTC
Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcpv6bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcpv6bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E371A02D9 for <dhcpv6bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:53:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ppLfKsJ-AZyK for <dhcpv6bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:53:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ea0-x22b.google.com (mail-ea0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CB91A02D5 for <dhcpv6bis@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:53:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ea0-f171.google.com with SMTP id h10so4668631eak.16 for <dhcpv6bis@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:53:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QZXaAAuHnJB7tznTmIsVUdWtWt6GOAzsD7LvZk8CHds=; b=b1hPkkkLsTLgFaAPzAA/AB0dMLPSS4wQpC5RNSP1O26Zgx5ponOVWjfbEhdScasLEz I23oQc9TzCTxfzohnnZYEaK0Ah72Ic5Tpf1vFinM3sOIs8eRCbSrAO0Esb72h+YwaNfF 8g4OUAypnc7yJcUDXNcFZlOCjNAp+YF3idw5CokftGQ0KfmY23AHf7GdzffwzHbF/7Sz 1bWVOzJMGYU0eI8tWesKYbrtiljUhYD50JVCCZErWdhP08orSHK/+PO5Ex9TMOH/mbYi KLUK47CKBHCe63i/ZVIMSJpeSjnmbYLyhLSoDC/oF5wD9VxQMYD/VYrZ0oVWc+4H2f57 xCxw==
X-Received: by 10.14.200.197 with SMTP id z45mr671167een.98.1390405993287; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:53:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z49sm28498645eeo.10.2014.01.22.07.53.11 for <dhcpv6bis@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 07:53:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52DFE95F.4000400@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:53:03 +0100
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dhcpv6bis@ietf.org
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Dhcpv6bis] 2014-01-22 meeting minutes
X-BeenThere: dhcpv6bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "DHCPv6 \(RFC3315\) bis discussion list" <dhcpv6bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcpv6bis>, <mailto:dhcpv6bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcpv6bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcpv6bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcpv6bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcpv6bis>, <mailto:dhcpv6bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:53:17 -0000
We had a very good WebEx meeting today and made several decisions. I took some notes during the meeting. Here's the cleaned up version of them. Please correct if I missed or misunderstood anything. Note: All tickets numbers refer to the tickets in out issue tracker: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/dhcpv6bis/ Thanks to Bernie for organizing this call. Attendees: Bernie Marcin Michael Sheng Tomek Andrew couldn't make it this time, because of a trip. He asked some tasks be assigned to him. 1. Confirm that XML for 3315 is done. The only outstanding item was to implement soft cross-references. Bernie did that this week (thanks!). We closed tickets #1,#2,#3 and #4. 2. Confirm that XML for 3633 is done. Confirmed. Closing #5. 3. Get over a list of proposed RFCs/drafts to merge. RFC7083 - SOL_MAX_RT and INF_MAX_RT Decision: Add a text that SOL_MAX_RT and INF_MAX_RT should be processed by clients even if status code indicates failure. Incorporate the text and obsolete 7083. RFC6977 - Triggered reconfigure We initially thought that it's about making explicit the currently implicit assumption that the relays do not modify client's messages and based on that info we decided to include clarification that relays do not modify any relayed message (regardless if the message goes up or down). Unfortunately, that is the clarification done in RFC6422. So the decision we made is not valid and this topic will have to be revisited. RFC3736 - stateless DHCPV6 Decision: Add new section for minimal stateless implemention should be. Then obsolete 3736. RFC6355 - DUID-UUID Decision: Include code type 4, reference 6355, do NOT obsolete 6355. RFC6644 - rebind in reconfigure Decision: Incorporate everything. My may discuss with Ted whether to obsolete it, but it seems that the 6644 text will still be technically valid, so we can leave it. RFC6422 - relay supplied options Decision is postponed, as nobody on the call knew what exactly that RFC changes (it updates 3315). draft-ietf-dhc-stateful-issues - The tentative decision was to include all the changes, assuming it progresses (it is in WGLC right now). Tomek will create each section 4.x in issue tracker. draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-unknown-msg - handling by relays Decision was to include the text. It's a relatively simple clarification that relays must forward unknown messages. Bernie proposed to add a section (appendix?) for "Changes from 3315/3633". This will be used by people who are familiar with 3315 and want to see what's changed (e.g. implementors, document authors). 5. Decide on next steps - go over reported issues in the tracker. Segregate them into: a) obvious/easy to do => apply them before merge b) widely supported, but harder to do => apply them after merge c) awaiting-consensus => leave them for discussion on DHC WG - apply/close issues marked as a) - upload new revision - merge - upload new revision - apply/close issues makred as b) - request adoption in DHC - discuss issues from c) group on DHC WG, get consensus on them, apply or reject on a per case basis - WGLC once all issues are closed Marcin asked whether we could start discussions on DHC earlier. Sheng was a bit concerned that WG may say that it did not agree to something. The general conclusion was that it is ok to discuss on DHC whenever we want. 6. Come up with the merge 3633/3315 strategy. This looks like a too big task for a single person, so we'll probably try to split this work among two volunteers. Haven't given much thought about how to do this, but each person being responsible for moving roughly a half of the 3633 sections seems like a good idea. This is to PLAN the merge (what terminology to use, i.e. Requesting Router = DHCPv6 Client for PD) and what will need to be updated in RFC 3315 (new sections to add, sections to update, etc.). Note also that stateful issues draft changes some PD related items so be mindful of this (though those are not yet 'approved'). Michael volunteered for this task and we agreed that this would be also good task for Andrew to help with. 7. Go over reported issues in issue tracker and split into groups. Unfortunately we ran out of time. So Tomek will go over some of the tickets and assign them to interested folks, so everyone will have something to do for the next week or two. Action items: Bernie to submit tickets from bake-offs. Tomek to submit tickets for RFCs/drafts (see agenda item 3 above). Tomek to submit tickets from stateful-issues Tomek to go over existing tasks and assign a couple to every bis team member. Tomek will create milestones (a-trivial/do-now b-larger/do after merge, c-awaiting-consensus, will discuss on DHC) We made a good progress today. Thank you all and safe travels to Andrew! Tomek
- [Dhcpv6bis] 2014-01-22 meeting minutes Tomek Mrugalski