IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-netboot-05

Stephen Jacob <Stephen.Jacob@nominum.com> Tue, 06 October 2009 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <Stephen.Jacob@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E5228C108 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Ty2BQU7dJHY for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og103.obsmtp.com (exprod7og103.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.159]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E69228C194 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob103.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSsuxExNtlUFDl1n1FYqf7jgOvxN8RYSq@postini.com; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:05:24 PDT
Received: by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix, from userid 11053) id 4B6601B82F9; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:05:30 -0700
From: Stephen Jacob <Stephen.Jacob@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Message-ID: <20091006210530.GD30094@shell-too.nominum.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, Stephen Jacob <Stephen.Jacob@nominum.com>, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <16A6AF20B09CDF48A96DABA42BF6793744EB8D4AD9@GVW1092EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> <200910062041.n96Kf4WS021306@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <20091006205250.GC30094@shell-too.nominum.com> <76124947-CA70-412C-80D9-8B9495A60A56@nominum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <76124947-CA70-412C-80D9-8B9495A60A56@nominum.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-URI: http://www.nominum.com/
Organization: Nominum, Inc.
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-netboot-05
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:04:05 -0000

On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:55:06PM -0700, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2009, at 1:52 PM, Stephen Jacob wrote:
> >I tend to agree that unless there is a compelling reason to forbid  
> >zero,
> >zero should simply be the highest precedence.
> 
> The precedence value is used in two types of option.   In one of  
> these, it's a wild card.   In the other, a wild card is not  
> appropriate, hence it's forbidden.

Oops. :) Alright, that's a good reason.

Regards,
Stephen
-- 
 Stephen Jacob | Stephen.Jacob@nominum.com | +1 650 381 6051
 Nominum, Inc. |  http://www.nominum.com/  | +1 650 381 6000

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email