IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02 - Respond by Dec 18

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Tue, 10 December 2013 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2661AE0FB for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:38:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8KuMx-dMdeEm for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:38:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5685F1ADED7 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 18:38:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1745; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386643131; x=1387852731; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=tuvriIA+12bB2nS5LL/moGS9uz65+58+4dNbJAAGX1k=; b=gVAgOXCP7HWseiuqiiwNYrQldPTrx7BXuBfAMds6jIcFUZHx58ZvCy/t s7b9a1ylaf/OoP6D3zKW6bmeuJpC+bd/2VLeL40dv1bgrsFvIPSPeQVoy PYQ7AbnaI0zS27BZ2ThVcSNvDRHVza0DXKxdpSJjwdkPkInr+ggHeLWT9 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoYFADB+plKtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4U7kTgSIWbQeCJQEBAQQdHUsEAgEIEQQBAQsUCQcyFAkIAQEEEwiHeg3AUheOPwEBHgYyBoMagRMDmUSQY4FrgT6BcTk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,862,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="290453479"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2013 02:38:51 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBA2cp4O005758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:38:51 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.232]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:38:51 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02 - Respond by Dec 18
Thread-Index: Ac7xD0TQ86CV+plkQwGdrBXmDcXNywEEvfxQ
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:38:50 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADDBD00@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADD09A3@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1ADD09A3@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.241.102]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02 - Respond by Dec 18
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 02:38:58 -0000

<WG co-chair hat off>

I support adopting this work - but I am a co-author so that's probably not a big surprise.

As the WG has adopted the DHCPv6 work, this really should be pretty easy, from a IETF standards view, to work on as it is similar extensions to the DHCPv4 bulk leasequery to support this.

<WG co-chair hat on>

While it is an early reminder as we still have more than a week to go, but ... please do forward your thoughts after reviewing the document.

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 11:47 AM
To: Kim Kinnear (kkinnear); dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02 - Respond by Dec 18

Hi all:

This is a WG Call for Adoption for http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02. This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG consensus to adopt this work as DHC WG item. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying to this mail. If you are not in favor, please also state your objections in your response. This adoption call will complete on December 18, 2013.

This call is being initiated because during the call for adoption for draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00, which was just adopted, several people asked about the related DHCPv4 work. Kim republished the DHCPv4 draft (with minor updates) as it had expired a while ago. So, we are seeking input as to whether the WG should now also work on the DHCPv4 version of active leasequery, given that the DHCPv6 version was adopted.

Regards,
Tomek & Bernie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email