Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02 - Respond by Dec 18
"Dushyant Raghuvanshi (draghuva)" <draghuva@cisco.com> Tue, 10 December 2013 04:29 UTC
Return-Path: <draghuva@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA191AE199 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:29:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SgN2pQHT1C6x for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFB91AE197 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:29:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4492; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386649778; x=1387859378; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=cdC1jbnNvAd8hzBShk1UAhatQBMDuuhlk+ADIFAmjFo=; b=ehnzQnjJf3I8+KuM75K100VT25inwvmuhTsxXRGllHd04oklastZEjT0 OkTxkONMvkIhBMhc2JTPEtHsZTegUqvHUWlRZsjX+JPaPDqTbAN99GPck 3uF6LEDfLpGF5RDlOOBty+II4CaXZGO93CP2ZhhtD9YpIa1TLlnsF6yco 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAMuXplKtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4TQa5E4EjFnSCJQEBAQQBAQEaHTQXBgEIEQMBAQEfMQYLHQoEAQkJCYdnAw8IBblWDYZnF4x9gTsHAQEcQIQtA5QxgXiBa4EwiyqFOYFrgT6BaAkXIg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,863,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="5577683"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2013 04:29:38 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBA4TcfE004886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:29:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.4.34]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 22:29:37 -0600
From: "Dushyant Raghuvanshi (draghuva)" <draghuva@cisco.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "Kim Kinnear (kkinnear)" <kkinnear@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02 - Respond by Dec 18
Thread-Index: AQHO9WBvCfAoyNkwCEyQ9quqPOif0Q==
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:29:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CECC9632.246DA%draghuva@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.62.128]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1674729BFAEA934BB18B162D75DD9599@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02 - Respond by Dec 18
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 04:29:46 -0000
I support this draft to be adopted as working group item. Thanks, Dushyant. On 04/12/13 10:16 PM, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> wrote: >Hi all: > >This is a WG Call for Adoption for >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02. >This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG consensus >to adopt this work as DHC WG item. Please state whether or not you're in >favor of the adoption by replying to this mail. If you are not in favor, >please also state your objections in your response. This adoption call >will complete on December 18, 2013. > >This call is being initiated because during the call for adoption for >draft-raghuvanshi-dhc-dhcpv6-active-leasequery-00, which was just >adopted, several people asked about the related DHCPv4 work. Kim >republished the DHCPv4 draft (with minor updates) as it had expired a >while ago. So, we are seeking input as to whether the WG should now also >work on the DHCPv4 version of active leasequery, given that the DHCPv6 >version was adopted. > >Regards, >Tomek & Bernie > >-----Original Message----- >From: Kim Kinnear (kkinnear) >Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 11:25 AM >To: dhcwg@ietf.org >Cc: Kim Kinnear (kkinnear); Bernie Volz (volz); Tomek Mrugalski >Subject: New Version Notification for >draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02.txt > > >Folks, > >During the adoption discussion about DHCPv6 Active Leasequery there was >some discussion about having a corresponding DHCPv4 Active Leasequery >capability. If there is sufficient interest in a DHCPv4 Active >Leasequery capability to parallel the DHCPv6 capability that was adopted >as a DHC WG work item recently, then we can decide whether or not we want >to have two drafts moving toward two RFC's, or combine them into one >draft. > >But the first question is whether or not there is sufficient interest in >having a DHCPv4 Active Leasequery capability at all! > >In order to help decide this question, I have updated the existing >DHCPv4 Active Leasequery draft from a couple of years ago, and >resubmitted it as an individual submission -- as recommended by Bernie >and Tomek. > >Below you can find the information on how to find this new draft. > >Regards -- Kim > > >Begin forwarded message: > >> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> >> Subject: New Version Notification for >> draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02.txt >> Date: December 4, 2013 10:01:03 AM EST >> To: Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, Mark Stapp <mjs@cisco.com>, Kim >> Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>, Neil Russell <neil.e.russell@gmail.com> >> >> >> A new version of I-D, >> draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Kim Kinnear and posted to the IETF >> repository. >> >> Filename: draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery >> Revision: 02 >> Title: Active DHCPv4 Lease Query >> Creation date: 2013-12-04 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Number of pages: 22 >> URL: >>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-lease >>query-02.txt >> Status: >>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequer >>y >> Htmlized: >>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leasequery-02 >> Diff: >>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4-active-leaseque >>ry-02 >> >> Abstract: >> The Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv4 (DHCPv4) has been >> extended with a Leasequery capability that allows a client to request >> information about DHCPv4 bindings. That mechanism is limited to >> queries for individual bindings. In some situations individual >> binding queries may not be efficient, or even possible. In addition, >> continuous update of an external client with Leasequery data is >> sometimes desired. This document expands on the DHCPv4 Leasequery >> protocol, and allows for active transfer of near real-time DHCPv4 >> address binding information data via TCP. >> >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >>tools.ietf.org. >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> > >_______________________________________________ >dhcwg mailing list >dhcwg@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Kim Kinnear
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Dushyant Raghuvanshi (draghuva)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Deepak Kukrety (dkukrety)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Sheng Jiang
- [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4… Neil Russell
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Mathias Samuelson
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Kim Kinnear
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Mathias Samuelson
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dh… Bernie Volz (volz)
- [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call draft-kinnear-dhc-dhcpv4… Tomek Mrugalski