Re: [dhcwg] dhc-addr-notification: input required on the client behaviour
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 09 January 2024 16:42 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FF3C14CE2B for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 08:42:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yWlc91UX5Flo for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 08:41:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DFA9C14F5E5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 08:41:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5537dd673e5so2717143a12.0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:41:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari.net; s=google; t=1704818517; x=1705423317; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sTL/bbTJ4XaE6yGNUREBGgyLammmCgMZQeLw1JxluN8=; b=MC55GAe2WRET3SfbXMLJb4wtpllmboa5O/I72d4nWLrZjjkiMKdHRu8Cd+ap/2CRyP N/EPTSJTgcX3xkQ+I8m21ncBSFfh7PpdJcESAKqVdGcRWOIm6dQnmsCvlSriQeDace79 y+3m5xNVfMlF6ItxG62l06XYh/t9pVMHoGjY6ss3SpESl64oXgBbFb54viKb5mMoNoDD dKzJhmUqn+XSOXzJ0g49zhdvz/GJR8YnhkPsYlF2BdX4j0Q9Y2wgkaPbQ99gBxv+fobO 9VP3wT8whGAn9Mfxs1a4b/sNVFlStLr3mgXru1079lWrYRLUMNMj1nS3bLTIO6mpATDR Dm0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704818517; x=1705423317; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=sTL/bbTJ4XaE6yGNUREBGgyLammmCgMZQeLw1JxluN8=; b=GQ9B0AucdQPep7zsKlGI6nr4GaqMTQJNLYoYjO1lJJ2BYwFdnVP7yeToRlgQlqGbFg +gfkS9YZiQoC2wHMxWD1u2nyHXRKG6lO0GanRUKFsNjjBtKvXpBcR8j/jyizDYp5cMSC ITAbrqSi47M9d2/bbxsJdN9I4pb4bX5xzp83lQmqcJL3GAVvpMCUhwXU2MbBeOCedc7S 5W7vtLKL6lwBxLMFAsxsixubKzz+HvUgQLsSLtJxw/HM5yvQtOKPrAgnTySOH1P9VLZR n+CpIcYBanzNOwZ8PK743Yx2neRycukTSx7i6cKBQy3eckWtB1wi5eid/EXJC1shhwvp dhjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz+p6xVZcGCovNx46i2E7NPFVLRTVIMdp3yvtOeOCwlWMjdNOMM RbAo9RR52I/EJhYKbTE/Bicmq79YxhPvrbek3NfwUIpQcA1YNFtWkDcAxFii
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE5jQauHLGfajPvMg4YmMuoCzXIAobrAA4YqkaiIz8q3rFuQVqFjU1xgKBMGluH/ORO5cEr5eeM7eTyZnlaa+A=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:c2ca:0:b0:558:3339:b05f with SMTP id u10-20020a50c2ca000000b005583339b05fmr18452edf.75.1704818517115; Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 649336022844 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 9 Jan 2024 08:41:56 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Superhuman-Draft-ID: draft007823e9ba7e81bf
References: <CAFU7BASCOHV_HQriarduvEjs5hUMwt3Qad+31AVwTjb=GQdmmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=mhYdCNg3r9qU+7oStpD34bHWqFMo0AzVA5BJo5v=iVw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Superhuman Desktop (2024-01-08T20:06:10Z)
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1=mhYdCNg3r9qU+7oStpD34bHWqFMo0AzVA5BJo5v=iVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
X-Superhuman-ID: lr6kwy0r.52a084e6-8e78-43ab-8fb8-20fa4c47111e
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 08:41:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJErpjX3BizFRjCKLJOsTXVCHBcQdzZQeTGgEKTYAEd4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001e9936060e85fed7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/1Xp-4sjyslu-6WNjrBG2eGQ2-4k>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] dhc-addr-notification: input required on the client behaviour
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2024 16:42:03 -0000
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:07 AM, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 4:15 AM Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Would the group be OK if -08 contains Bernie's proposal? >> >> Not speaking for the group, obviously, but I think this is the right > choice. Anything else is an unnecessarily complicated protocol fix to a > configuration mistake. > Yup / +1. If the "failure mode" was more harmful then I'd have a different view, but seeing as it is a trivial amount of traffic (and in a weird corner case), I think that it's the right solution…. W
- [dhcwg] dhc-addr-notification: input required on … Jen Linkova
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc-addr-notification: input required… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc-addr-notification: input required… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc-addr-notification: input required… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc-addr-notification: input required… Sheng JIANG