RE: [dhcwg] Extending the set of available DHCP option codes
"Bernie Volz" <volz@metrocast.net> Fri, 30 January 2004 18:54 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA08344 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:54:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Amdlk-0001BK-3e for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:53:32 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0UIrWfR004464 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:53:32 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Amdli-00019U-Up for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:53:30 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA08339 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:53:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Amdlg-0003kf-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:53:28 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Amdkp-0003bz-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:52:36 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmdkL-0003UB-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:52:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AmdkI-0006Uv-OW; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:52:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Amdjz-0005kV-OU for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:51:43 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA08201 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:51:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Amdjx-0003TN-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:51:41 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Amdiz-0003K1-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:50:42 -0500
Received: from aphrodite.gwi.net ([207.5.128.164]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AmdiU-0003AJ-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:50:10 -0500
Received: from BVolz (d-216-195-132-224.metrocast.net [216.195.132.224]) by aphrodite.gwi.net (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0UIo157087948; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:50:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from volz@metrocast.net)
From: Bernie Volz <volz@metrocast.net>
To: rbhibbs@pacbell.net, dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Extending the set of available DHCP option codes
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:50:00 -0500
Message-ID: <000001c3e761$e085e0a0$6401a8c0@BVolz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <KIEPLODFDDAMBAJNDFPCGEEEGBAA.rbhibbs@pacbell.net>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Barr: If you'd like to work on this, please feel free to initiate that effort (in conjunction with RFC2131bis there should be a RFC2132bis?). - Bernie -----Original Message----- From: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-admin@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Barr Hibbs Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 1:04 PM To: dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: RE: [dhcwg] Extending the set of available DHCP option codes While I agree that the selection of option (1) gives us the greatest immediate and long-term benefit for DHCPv4, I still believe we should pursue reclamation of additional option codes per the misunderstanding expressed as option (2). --Barr > At the WG meeting in Minneapolis, the WG accepted two mechanisms for > extending the set of available DHCP option codes from > draft-ietf-dhc-extended-optioncodes-00.txt: > > (1) redesignate option codes 128-223 to be assigned to new options > (2) recover disused option codes (the "Impress Server" option being > the canonical example) for reassignment to new options > > It turns out we misunderstood the second of these two mechanisms; the > author of draft-ietf-dhc-extended-optioncodes-00.txt (Bernie Volz) was > referring to option codes already under consideration for reclamation in > "Unused Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Option Codes" > (RFC 3679), rather than option codes defined in RFC 2132 that currently > see little use. > > Therefore, we should not follow up on (2) and will pursue only (1) > (which is now published as draft-ietf-dhc-reclassify-options-00). > _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg