RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate and srsn-optiondrafts
"Bernie Volz \(volz\)" <volz@cisco.com> Sat, 10 February 2007 00:28 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFg6n-0000IJ-W4; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:28:53 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFg6m-0000AH-NA for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:28:52 -0500
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFg6l-00089z-AY for dhcwg@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:28:52 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2007 19:28:51 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.13,308,1167627600"; d="scan'208"; a="113527593:sNHT59225252"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l1A0SpQq009041; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:28:51 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l1A0SoVV026583; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:28:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.15]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 19:28:50 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate and srsn-optiondrafts
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:28:47 -0500
Message-ID: <8E296595B6471A4689555D5D725EBB210333ECF1@xmb-rtp-20a.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <45CB0D91.2060605@uninett.no>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate and srsn-optiondrafts
thread-index: AcdLdz7ztjCWQUvNSAOvK02henem3ABMMsvg
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Stig Venaas <stig.venaas@uninett.no>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Feb 2007 00:28:50.0773 (UTC) FILETIME=[6FD50050:01C74CAA]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=4065; t=1171067331; x=1171931331; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=volz@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Bernie=20Volz=20\(volz\)=22=20<volz@cisco.com> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[dhcwg]=20dhc=20wg=20last=20call=20on=20agentopt-dele gate=20and=20srsn-optiondrafts |Sender:=20 |To:=20=22Stig=20Venaas=22=20<stig.venaas@uninett.no>, =20=22dhcwg=22=20<d hcwg@ietf.org>; bh=qHMKrNFfBEKkPlh1kgn3cSZhoIDlWcrssUD4Fi1cQ74=; b=NllM3alL6NGa1GkQHHD2m38HizCh/1gDyKsSNKlqCgIdo0aGq1cCHnlca7mh2UjkcPnVVrdQ tj6tqwLYTJz2Q8D+uIiZ5JLAxTnYY/mAufsWSAjapB23upncx5+nU8hd;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=volz@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 32b73d73e8047ed17386f9799119ce43
Cc:
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
I'd also suggest that members read http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-stenberg-pd-route-maintenance- 00.txt. Perhaps agentopt-delegate combined with some of the concepts in this other draft (such as Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)) can be used to provide additional information/feedback loops to address some of the shortcomings. In particular, if a client releases or declines a delegated prefix or stateful address but the router fails to receive the Reply with the updated RAAN information, the router would find out via BFD that the client is no longer using it and could stop announcing the route (and/or perform a leasequery to assure it has updated information). I too do not feel that having the DHCP server handle the route injection is feasible; it comes with its own set of issues since the server has no idea whether the router(s) are up, the full paths (hops) to the routers, the metrics with which to advertise the routes, etc. Snooping has its own set of issues and complexities. Even more so with DHCP authentication as you probably don't want to require the relay also have the keys. Snooping is also subject to the issues that the SRSN option attempted to solve, so if snooping were the desired solution, we still need the SRSN option. - Bernie -----Original Message----- From: Stig Venaas [mailto:stig.venaas@uninett.no] Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 6:46 AM To: dhcwg Subject: Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate and srsn-optiondrafts As I wrote below, these drafts did not pass wglc. Most members of the wg did not respond to the last call. Some of those who responded had technical objections to agentopt-delegate. We now need to find out what to do next. Do people believe that we don't need this, do you believe that snooping is a fine alternative? Or do you believe it can be done in some other way? The main issue is how to inject the necessary routes into the routing system. From a routing point of view it would be reasonable to have the route announced by the router that requested and was assigned the prefix. However this router would often be a customer router where the ISP router would not accept such route advertisements unless it knows they are legitimate. If the ISP router does not know what prefixes the customer has been assigned, some form of authentication would be needed. I don't know if that exists and it sounds complicated. agentopt-delegate would allow the ISP router to know what prefixes to allow routes for, or to announce routes for those itself. Another theoretical possibility would be for the DHCP server to somehow inject the route itself on behalf of the customer. I believe this is generally not possible, and does not sounds like a particularly nice solution. In short, what I would like to ask is, what is the alternative solution, or don't we need one? Or can the agentopt-delegate solution be improved in some way? I would like to get some discussion on this so that we can determine where to go next with these drafts. Stig Stig Venaas wrote: > Stig Venaas wrote: >> This message announces a wg last call on two drafts. They are >> >> DHCPv6 Relay Agent Assignment Notification (RAAN) Option >> <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate-02.txt> >> >> and >> >> DHCPv6 Server Reply Sequence Number Option >> <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-srsn-option-00.txt>. >> >> The last call will conclude at 1700EST on Mon, 2007-01-15. > > These drafts did not pass wg last call. It appears we need to > further investigate whether there are better approaches, or > maybe even whether snooping is sufficient. In particular, > draft-stenberg-pd-route-maintenance may help us find or > eliminate other approaches. Apart from route injection, there > may be other reasons why the relay agent needs this information, > e.g. access control. > > Stig _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate and… Stig Venaas
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Stig Venaas
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… David W. Hankins
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Kim Kinnear
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Bernie Volz (volz)
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Bernie Volz (volz)
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Stig Venaas
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Stig Venaas
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Bernie Volz (volz)
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Andre Kostur
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Stig Venaas
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Bernie Volz (volz)
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Bernie Volz (volz)
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Bernie Volz (volz)
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Bernie Volz (volz)
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Templin, Fred L
- RE: [dhcwg] dhc wg last call on agentopt-delegate… Bernie Volz (volz)